Lampley is the one who gave boxing a black eye.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TheGreat, Jun 16, 2012.


  1. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Jim "Bang Bang" Lampley is a disgrace, this was a close fight that honestly could've gone to Bradley, instead of being a neutral commentator he along with Lederman shamelessly cheerleaded and created a controversy with their extreme bias.
     
  2. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    It's not extreme bias when a vast majority of fans, fighters, trainers, media observers, and commentating personalities all consider it a robbery. If Bradley-Pacquiao was that close, practically any scoring outcome can be justified and there's no point in declaring a winner.
     
  3. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    Where was the half hour *****-fest show for Marquez?
     
  4. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006
    Exactly!!
     
  5. TitoMahawk

    TitoMahawk Retarded trolls detector Full Member

    2,381
    0
    Jul 12, 2011
    I think the fight was very close.

    I'm not gonna say that those who think otherwise are ******ed but, I don't think it is such a big controversy.

    I think Lampley & Co. really lost it in that fight.

    (I think Pacquiao won)
     
  6. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006
    Good post!:good
     
  7. TitoMahawk

    TitoMahawk Retarded trolls detector Full Member

    2,381
    0
    Jul 12, 2011
    Yeah.

    I'm gonna be honest and say: When I watched it live, I had no problem with Pacquiao winning against Marquez.

    Then I rewatched it and decided to score it (seeing how opinions were different about the outcome).


    I had it something like 6-1 for Marquez after 7 and then I stopped...
     
  8. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    The coverage of the fight was extremely biased they showed no replay or gave any acknowledgement of Bradley's work, only showing Pac highlights, as well as citing bogus compubox numbers that claimed Pac landed as many shots as Bradley in the 10th. When Bradley was clearly beating Pac late in the fight there were long awkward pauses in the commentary, followed by more one-sided highlights, meant to sway public opinion.
     
  9. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    In other words most of the public was swayed by the commentary.
     
  10. Stop crying already. Must suck to hear so much praise for a fighter u r so so butthurt over
     
  11. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    No one but you *******s are crying, I'm fine with the decision, you guys are the ones sending Bradley death threats and ****.
     
  12. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
    Yup... lamps defo feels the way his eyes do wearing ***g hoe glasses.
    (Shout out to George Michael)
     
  13. Danmann

    Danmann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,427
    21
    Oct 30, 2011
    Lampley does what others do, try to create a controversy all the time, even if one is unnecessary, and if one is deserved (like Pac -Bradley) he amps it up to raise ratings. Him and Kellerman are full of ****.
     
  14. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    I would say that's HBO's fault as a whole. It's strange because HBO dickrides emmanuel whether he's getting a clear boxing lesson and gift like the Juan 3, or having a competitive match where he's robbed.

    I'm curious to see what HBO commentating will be like for a Mayweather-emmanuel fight when Floyd is schooling emmanuel. Floyd and HBO the network for the most part have a good relation.
     
  15. LoRd_inFamousX1

    LoRd_inFamousX1 Lord of the Square Rings Full Member

    4,133
    4
    May 18, 2012
    I was thinking the same exact thing