Lampley was way out of line last night (on Margarito's "cheating")

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by My2Sense, Jan 26, 2009.


  1. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Almost as soon was Lampley broke the news of something (we're not sure exactly what yet) being removed from Margo's gloves, he straightaway went into "This HAS TO call into question Margarito's win over Cotto!!!" He was very irresponsible to do that. We don't even know the full details about this incident, and he's already proclaiming the Cotto fight being "tainted". If he was going to get riled up about something, it should've at least been the incident that just happened, the one that Margo is actually accused of. But instead, he glosses over this incident and completely fabricates another one and runs with it. Look at the pissed-off look on his face as he was discussing it, you could see the anger in his eyes. It's as if he's still steaming about Cotto getting upset (remember when he cried after the fight? LOL) and he's still desperately looking for any excuse to jump on.

    Heck, why didn't he ask if he had cheated in other fights, period? Why was the Cotto fight the only one he mentioned and the only one he fixated on?

    Not only that, but by implying (with no evidence whatsover) that Margo has "cheated" in other fights and thus is less of a fighter now without his "tools", he inadvertently took credit away from Mosley for his effort.

    I'd love to see it come out somehow that the commission made a mistake and there was no illegal substance in Margo's gloves after all. That would make Lampley look like the ass of all asses (which he has always kinda been anyway IMO).

    Lampley is a total tool IMO.
     
  2. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    grounds for libel?
     
  3. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    That's why I was hoping the story would turn out to be false somehow. If he did, I'd love to see Margo sue his ass.

    Technically, it could still be grounds for libel even if Margo cheated in this particular fight, seeing as there's no proof he ever cheated before. But I doubt he'd sue or win a lawsuit if he really did cheat vs. Mosley.
     
  4. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Lampley was in love with Cotto and had something against AM for defeating Cotto
     
  5. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Agreed.

    That pissed-off expression on his face while he was accusing Margo of "cheating" against Cotto was absurd and way over-the-top.
     
  6. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    This is why i prefer Berstien.

    Big Al been doing a great job for years.

    F*$k HBO.
     
  7. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest


    I told you guys you cant trust those cats. Their backstabbers, they'll turn on you quick.
     
  8. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    Yep they do.

    **** they turned on one of there biggest draws in PBF.

    With all the he is to boring ****.

    Mate PBF was there biggest Gun.

    Thats why i love Bernstien always tells a side to both stories unfolding in the ring.

    Not what his opinion is.
     
  9. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    It would be considered slander...libel is written.

    I wouldn't blame Lamps too much for his comments...more than likely it was probably the shows producer that wanted him to bring up the Cotto fight comments.

    I think everyone would be surprised at how much direction these guys have to take from the show's producer.
     
  10. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest


    LoL. The way they were sucking JT's tip, it was ridiculous.
     
  11. link2296

    link2296 Boxing Addict banned

    5,713
    1
    Apr 10, 2007
    Are you kidding? Bernstien plays favorties just like most boxing spectators. He is no better than Lamps.
     
  12. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    No grounds for slander. He isn't making an accusation.
     
  13. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Man, all those commentators have turned at least once. I mean, Foreman & RJJ used to love PBF, they turned on him. Only guy I can give any props to is Lennox.
     
  14. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    LMAO. Oh yeah it was good when Pavlik stopped all that ****.
     
  15. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    Yeah he has favs but not like Lampley.

    And if someone he doesnt like as much is winning he takes nothing away from them like HBO do.