LAMPLEY'S Advice for KIRKLAND: Go GHETTO on Him...!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cotto(e), Mar 24, 2012.


  1. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    I'm from a working class neighborhood myself, I'm Latino, and know plenty of people that would object to a white man with an education equating ghettoness with inherent violence. Lampley, at the age that he's at, had an education very early on, and given this comment, is probably not connected enough to struggling communities to gauge what's appropriate and what's just caricature. It's one thing for poor minorities and working class whites to use certain terms among themselves, and another thing completely to espouse such an implication over a sports commentary. Obviously, not only blacks live in the ghetto, but if Lampley ever says that about a white person, I will sell you my house. The face of poverty is black, and "ghettoness" is a concept tied specifically to blacks. Language is political, whether you recognize it or not. Notice that many people agreeing with the TS's point of view are of color. Is Lampley going to say Floyd is "going ghetto" by saving his money like a poor person would? Is a boxer that works hard hours on end like a ghetto minority on a minimum wage "going ghetto"? No. It was a phrase linked directly to violence, and implicating that everyone from a rough area has an inherent capacity for language, in reference to a black fighter, is racist.

    And I'll reiterate, it wasn't that big a deal. But to try and say race is unrelated to such a phrase is idiotic and ignores the power of words in specific social contexts. Tell a black person to "go ghetto" when playing a videogame or being jokingly insulted, and it likely won't go over well, for a reason. You seem much more adamant to prove that telling a fighter to "go ghetto" is harmless than I am offended by the comment. I simply didn't like it for the stated reasons. If you don't want to understand that, then that's fine, but don't rationalize away valid points on the language of race and class in media.
     
  2. the commentator

    the commentator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,470
    270
    Oct 26, 2011
    just logged in to ESB. any updates on whos winning the race card?????
     
  3. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    i didn't catch that but if he said it he was wrong for it, on the other hand I wouldn't consider it racist due to Kirkland's recent history and the fact that Wolfe tells him to "go ghetto".
     
  4. Villain

    Villain Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    128
    Jul 27, 2004
    The ghetto is a place and an economic class not a race. Nor is it exclusive to black people. Therefore while poor people MAY find this offensive (probably over sensitive when taken in context), I don't see how this is racist in any way.
     
  5. Uncle Roger

    Uncle Roger Boxing Addict banned

    5,945
    0
    Oct 12, 2011
    and bangladeshi mutts do:lol:
     
  6. Villain

    Villain Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    128
    Jul 27, 2004
    I think you are reading far too much into this. There is nothing RACIST about insinuating that ghettos are violent. That's a fact and it has to do with money, not race. Most every country in the world has ghettos and the people look very different.

    If there is any insinuation on the part of Lamply, its probably that people from the ghetto are rough and tough. I think its pretty common knowledge that people who have lived in that kind of atmosphere have been made tougher for it. It's just a trait, and not necessarily a bad thing.

    Pretty harmless comment seriously. There are unfortunately far too many examples of real racism in boxing to put any real weight on this comment.
     
  7. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    That's the current connotation in America (economic underclass), yes, but historically, ghettos contained people of certain ethnicity, nationality, or religion. See the Venetian ghetto.

    Anyway, I'm pretty sure Lampley likes to **** black chicks, so none of this matters. Unless he makes them call him Thomas Jefferson.
     
  8. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Would they object if it was a Indian,Latino,Arab, or Chinese man?

    Are you stating that because he has an Education he is not allowed to say certain things?

    Many people get student loans in order to fund their education so equating being well off and having an education is retarted.

    What if a Middle Class Black man got educated and did not grow up in the "ghetto" *cough* obama *cough*, would it be offensive for him to say such things?

    Pdiddy claims hes a "gangster" and that he grew up in the streets, In reality he grew up in a nice neigborhood with a hard working mom. If diddy were to say, "Go ghetto" would you be offended?

    :think
     
  9. No it is not racist. Going "ghetto" is like saying "going brutal" or have "no mercy." It is not like saying "go black" on him.
    And anyway,ghetto's aren't only black people. White people,Hispanic people,Indian people and Asian people live in Ghettos. Maybe the thread starter is the real racist because he thinks the term "ghetto" is equal to the term "black people."
    Lampley has worked with Foreman,Steward,Roy Jones and Lennox Lewis and all of a sudden he is a KKK member because of one comment?
    Lampley isn't an ignorant red neck. He is not racist. You guys have got to stop nitpicking and stop being such sensitive little pussies.
     
  10. xizor

    xizor Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,346
    1
    Oct 25, 2010
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  11. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    I'm saying that Lampley likely isn't familiar with that upbringing. If he were, I don't think he would have made that comment on television.

    I would object if it were said about someone from a different minority race as well, and the fact is, it was in reference to a black man, who belongs to the social group most associated by the ghetto. Race is related to class in a very real way. Not a clear, linear, direct way, but the association is historically there.

    If Obama said "go ghetto" in the same way, yes, I would be offended, because he's still saying that going ghetto = getting violent, which implies ghetto people are all inherently violent. When referring to a black boxer from such a background, it's even worse.

    For those saying "ghettoness" has nothing to do with blackness, I'll make a lifetime ban bet that Lampley doesn't ever say it again in reference to anyone who is not black, or even Latino. For those thinking race doesn't apply (as if it ever went away as an element of our interactions), google "ghetto" and tell me what the people that come up look like.

    It's less about who is saying it, and more about what is being portrayed. Some people may think it's nothing, and in truth, it's not a big deal and I don't see Lampley as a bigot, I like him as a commentator, but it is not cool to equate being from a ghetto and being violence on television. Language like that, however small, appearing in lots of seemingly innocent places, constantly and without critique, is what reinforces the social structure that creates disparities. I'm simply trying to explain my point of view as to why I personally didn't like it, and it relates to the way language shapes social norms. I wouldn't have to drag it out if people didn't adamantly try to rationalize phrasing that associates poverty with animalistic tendencies.
     
  12. Who is a polo?

    Who is a polo? Goldman Sachs VP Full Member

    40
    0
    Mar 23, 2012
    :lol::yep
     
  13. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    I honestly thought the comment from Wolfe was "go gorilla on his ass" and that Lampley just re-stated it. This never hit my radar.
     
  14. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    yes