Langford or Pep, who has the better resume?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by JAB5239, May 9, 2011.


Page 4 of 9
  1. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    59
    Feb 23, 2008
    Lol, more lies from are exposed friend!
     
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    #46
  2. quarry

    quarry Guest

    seems like i am the guy doing all the killing on this subject.
     
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    #47
  3. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    59
    Feb 23, 2008
    Nah, you're the guy avoiding all the questions. The poll speaks for itself.
     
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    #48
  4. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    yeah, your shitty posts are ****ing killing us in terms of comedy value, i told you already to **** off and rethink your life, why are you still posting?
     
    teeto, May 10, 2011
    teeto, May 10, 2011
    #49
  5. quarry

    quarry Guest

    check the site out and count the traffic, the proof is in the pudding.. i have exposed you again for the fraud which you are..
     
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    #50
  6. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    59
    Feb 23, 2008
    Im not having a competition to see who has more traffic. Both this and that board are good learning tools for open minded fans. So the only thing you have exposed is yourself as a troll.
     
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    #51
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Quarry raises a valid point, a resume isn't just about names, its about beating them and putting in the best performances against them. Pep was more dominant, Langford has the better names overall. Also Wills isn't necessarily better than Saddler despite him being much bigger, Langford was also an exctomorph who grew into a fully fledged 180lber. Still I'd go with Langford none the less
     
    PowerPuncher, May 10, 2011
    PowerPuncher, May 10, 2011
    #52
  8. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    59
    Feb 23, 2008
    I think this is a fair assessment. But shouldn't we also consider that Langford was forced to carry many fighters in order to secure pay days? From everything I've read Sam could have opened up and taken Ketchel out but held back in order to get the title shot.I think these things are important to look at, no?
     
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    #53
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Good point
     
    PowerPuncher, May 10, 2011
    PowerPuncher, May 10, 2011
    #54
  10. quarry

    quarry Guest

    i argued exactly what you have said here yet was ridiculed and told i was trolling. the problem is that whenever anyone makes a point which shows JAB to be wrong he see's red and goes into his slanderous ridiculing mode claiming that person is telling lies and trolling, he has used his moderating powers on the other forum to banish every poster who debated boxing and had the audacity to disagree with him.. he will now try to belittle me and make out i am some kind of idiot who talks ****, yet he knows in his heart that i have forgotten more about boxing than he will ever know just like all those other guys knew far more about this sport than he does yet he banned them for their knowledge, because he could not debate with us.
     
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    #55
  11. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    One of those things from Alien?

    Anyway, Langford has the easily better resume, his best wins/fights resume reads like a who's who from 135lbs-Heavyweight from the best of the Black Dynamite era, no question he has a much stronger resume than Pep...And is in my view the Greatest of All Time.
     
    Swarmer, May 10, 2011
    Swarmer, May 10, 2011
    #56
  12. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    59
    Feb 23, 2008
    Nope, you're doing a great job of that without any help from me. Carry on!
     
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    #57
  13. quarry

    quarry Guest

    i am not disagreeing with the point you make above nor am i saying Langford was not one of the true greats, what i am saying is that Willie Pep holds the greatest ever prime record in the history of boxing and you are saying "No he does not" yet the fact of the debate is that Willie Pep never lost to fighters who had a record of 7-1 or more losses on their record than they had wins and Sam lost to those kind of fighters repeatedly throughout his career.
     
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    #58
  14. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    59
    Feb 23, 2008
    I've never said Pep doesn't hold the greatest "prime record". But that isn't overall resume and Langford simply beat a better array of fighters over a bigger discrepancy in weight. I've used logic, examples and a poll to prove this, yet you seek to avoid the truth.
     
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    JAB5239, May 10, 2011
    #59
  15. quarry

    quarry Guest

    talk about double standards and telling lies.... pheeewww :huh
     
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    quarry, May 10, 2011
    #60
Page 4 of 9