Langford v Wlad?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Sep 5, 2013.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Come on.
     
  2. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,682
    80,957
    Aug 21, 2012
    LOL if only Unforgiven knew that Charr would finally become a champion, that 40 yo Povetkin and Old Man Pulev and the ghost of Chisora would be top fighters and that the HW champion would be a refugee from a fat farm after Wlad retired ... he may have enjoyed the strong and healthy era he was in ;)
     
  3. GOAT Primo Carnera

    GOAT Primo Carnera Member of the PC Fan Club Full Member

    2,665
    2,687
    Jan 28, 2018
    :lol::lol::lol:

    Not sure if I want to read his next reply.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2019
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    Klitschko is far worse matchup for Langford than Wilder. It's very unlikely that he would beat him. Of course, with someone as powerful as Langford there is always a puncher's chance but I wouldn't bet on it.

    Wladimir was extremely good at beating shorter fighters. Langford could give him some problems with his short body early on, but he wouldn't sustain the whole fight of very strong clinching, powerful jab and killer right hand.

    At least that's my opinion. You can't tame away Langford chances against anyone, but Wlad is one of the worst matchups I can think of for him.
     
  5. GreenLaternSucked

    GreenLaternSucked Member banned Full Member

    253
    176
    Jul 13, 2019
    For the clueless old senile boxing fans who picked Sam Langford. Maybe it is time to check yourself into a old peoples home. The 6'5 240 pound modern sized, modern skilled Wladimir Klitschko would of knocked out the primitive skilled 170 pound Langford in less than 30 seconds.