Langford vs. Baer

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Melankomas, Jul 23, 2024.


  1. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,995
    8,663
    Dec 18, 2022
    Boston Bonecrusher vs. Madcap Maxie, who wins? Would it be another Louis-style demolition, or would Maxie's size and power be too much?
     
  2. Ney

    Ney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,202
    10,675
    Feb 13, 2024
    I mean, if Braddock can beat him…
     
  3. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    2,883
    5,006
    Apr 20, 2024
    Baer was too big and Langford was too hittable.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Baer was hittable too,he had an great chin,but Sam could hit like few men ever have.
    Langford had lots of trouble with tall good jabbers Baer at 6' 2 1/2"was tall for the times but not a good jabber.
    Langford coped well with big guys, when he was prime , and we know Baer folded mentally from the punishment Louis administered.Tough call.
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2024
  5. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,773
    4,191
    Jan 6, 2024
    The only one to truly stop Braddock was prime Joe Louis and Braddock was 6 ft 2.
     
  6. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,995
    8,663
    Dec 18, 2022
    I think how hittable Sam was really depended on who he was fighting. Joe Jeannette rarely hit Langford clean in the 25min footage of their fight.
     
  7. Ney

    Ney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,202
    10,675
    Feb 13, 2024
    Langford was a lot better than Braddock though.
     
  8. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    2,883
    5,006
    Apr 20, 2024
    Baer's jab was serviceable. Not great, but serviceable and he had pretty decent footwork for a big man of his era. Jeanette gave Langford some problems with his movement before he got ground down inside. I can't see the 220 lb Baer getting outmuscled by a 180 lb Langford, who was only 5'7 and whose record was pretty patchy at HW. I'm pretty sure Baer was a harder puncher than Wills and Fulton too, who both KOed Langford so that's not out of the question either and leads me to believe Langford would have a harder time with Baer's power than Baer would have with Langford's.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  9. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,078
    8,146
    Jun 10, 2024
    Not sure about that first part, at least ... Wills was just as big, & an aging Langford was able to KO him twice.
     
  10. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,078
    8,146
    Jun 10, 2024
    Baer wasn't 220 during his peak, his weight ranged between 200-210.
     
    Dorrian_Grey likes this.
  11. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,078
    8,146
    Jun 10, 2024
    Langford was well past his prime by the time either one started KOing him.
     
  12. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,773
    4,191
    Jan 6, 2024
    Langfords a P4P top 5 great he was a lot better than most HW greats who could beat him.

    I rate Braddock much higher than most specifically cause he was a unique mix of power, size, chin and skills(if he weighed 190+). Langfords only got 2 of those things. Langford couldn't deal with a Fulton. The best big fighters(6 ft 2+) Langford beat were Gunboat and Wills who both beat him other days in Wills case many other days. Langford KO'd Gunboat fast but the Wills knockouts took 14 and 19 rounds he wouldn't get against a Max Baer.

    The fight after losing to Fulton Langford did stop Andre Anderson a 6 ft 5 giant who could hit hard but Anderson was really a step below the elite level and almost all his losses were knockouts and almost every good fighter he fought he lost to. Intrestingly one of Andersons only 2 losses that went the distance were to patented giant killer Jack Dempsey. But either way Andersons not a stand in for Baer here.

    Langford also bulked up to a career high of 206 to fight Anderson and was 200 when he knocked out Gunboat. 190 when he got Wills. Braddock is 6 ft 2 he should have been 200. Langford is 8 inches shorter. Against Johnson, Hague and Lang he was 156, 158 and 166. His world title fight with Jeanette he was 185. What is the ideal weight for Langford against Max? I'm not sure if there is one. If he comes in too light he can't hurt Max and is super vulnerable to Maxs power, if he comes in heavy he likely still can't hurt Max but Max can still knock him out and Langford is less effective. At 199 Langford lost a lopsided decision to Jeanette and the NYT called him "badly out of shape" at that weight Langford was not his best self but to fight Max thats how heavy he'd have to be.
     
  13. bolo specialist

    bolo specialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,078
    8,146
    Jun 10, 2024
    IMO, Langford was at his overall peak around 165 lb, but it's possible that his best weight as a HW was somewhere in the high 170s-low 190s range.
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  14. Dorrian_Grey

    Dorrian_Grey It came to me in a dream Full Member

    2,883
    5,006
    Apr 20, 2024
    In 18 fights where he got drubbed most of the other fights
     
  15. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,995
    8,663
    Dec 18, 2022
    Before Fulton caused Langford to become blind in one of his eyes, Wills went the distance with Sam each time he beat him. Even then it was 4-2, with Langford holding his own in the series until the Fulton fights.

    I'd argue the punishment hard punchers Wills, McVea and Fulton dished out on Sam reflects how tough Langford was, and how he could probably take what Baer had to offer. I doubt Baer was a better fundamental boxer than any of those men either.