It would be a surprising KO. NDNJ was up and down like a tart's knickers against Lemmy and Quillin without getting stopped. Guy is tough. Not seeing it as being one sided at all either, N'Dam really can move and box, his main flaw - if you can call it that - is that he's too willing to engage rather than just potshotting from range like Erislandy. TBH I'm not at all sure how it would play out, but no way is it a cakewalk for Lara.
It's Golovkin fans.. since Lemieux beat N'dam, and GGG beat Lemieux they're finding a way to credit Golovkin more. I'd give anyone 10:1 odds betting if they ever fought. This is such an fight for Lara. He would make N'dam look dumber than trout.
Yeah, sure I like GGG but not everyone goes for that kinda of tortutous fanboy logic. If you're inclined to think like that you have to acknowledge that you may be doing the same thing in reverse. Nah - If you've watched N'Dam you know the guy can really box, 10:1? You're being generous. Close fight, I don't think either has faced a stylistic challenge like the other before.
I wasnt even referring to you, I dont even remember any of your posts or who you are, but you did confirm this for me. It's just obvious that the poll is swayed this way due to the GGG fans. Close fight? What fight from N'dam showed you this. Lara eats boxers up alive, also N'dam can really box? Based off what? Who has he outboxed? , the guy has fought nobodies, and the names he's fought are all crude and very basic like Stevens, Lemieux and Quillin. N'dam outboxing Lemieux and Quillin in spots really doesn't say that he'll give Lara an iota of trouble. This is an extremely easy fight for Lara. I don't see Lara koing N'dam, maybe a knockdown or 2, but it'll be a 118-110 type fight.
He's twice your age and maybe twice as smart Ellerbe. Listen to him.:deal You're starting to make yourself look a little foolish breaking your back to make GGG fans look bad. Not everyone has a silly agenda, N'Dam is a damn good boxer and would present a ton of problems for a guy who lost to Carlos Molina and looked like hell against Angulo and Canelo.
Not really, unlike you I keep it real. You always have an agenda. When Quillin/Jacobs was stopped, what did I say? I picked Jacobs but I still said what I really felt. Postol/Matthyse, I picked Matthyse, Groves/Jack I picked Groves, in both of those fights I had Postol and Jack up in the RBR. The only people that aremaking themselves look foolish are people like you that are either trolling, or are just too biased for their own good. I've never seen you eat your crow, or keep it real once. You have a million excuses when you get a wrong pick, and you clearly have an agenda against guys like Lara, and Cotto. Lara didnt lose to Molina either, that's your opinion. I quesiton when you actually started following boxing if you're putting down a prime Molina. A prime Molina was the definition of an awkward boxer that makes fight sloppy. He's not a pure boxer in anyway, and N'dam fihgts NOTHING like him. N'dam is an extremely easy fight for Lara. If I thought otherwise, i'd pick N'dam. Unlike you, aside from some brit trolling, I keep it real with my picks on fights that are unrealistic, and won't happen. If I really were to troll GGG fans, I'd pick Lara over GGG, but stylistically I've always said I'd go with GGG.
Whatever. See what you want to see. It wasn't your opinion I was actually challenging, however - that's your business - but the sweeping statement that anyone rating N'Dam had to be a GGG fan.
Well you yourself admitted to being a GGG fan so all you did was prove my point furthermore. You accuse me of having some bias, but guess what, even when my guy is winning or won liek Jacobs/Quillin, if I think something is out of place, I'll speak my mind even if it makes my pick look less impressive. N'dam is just an extremely easy fight for Lara, and I'm not saying this because GGG and N'dam have a common opponent, it's actually what I think. Unlike what guys like CST do with Cotto/Lara, I don't discredit GGG or his opponents head to head against someone due to their fans being annoying.
I see. So liking or disliking fighter A invalidates any opinion you or I may have about fighter B. Unfortunately by definition none of us can be considered reliable judges of our own objectivity. Doesn't seem to be much point in discussing this further.
Who did he eat alive? He had to headbutt Vanes, poke Angulo in an eye and run from Canelo for 12 rounds. ... and again, he arguably lost to Molina.