Larry Holmes as #1 Heavyweight of All-Time???

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Renofan, Feb 11, 2010.


  1. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,530
    11,047
    Jul 28, 2009
    Exactly the way I have it on mine, for now.
    Haye beats Ruiz convincingly...might change.
     
  2. Quitali Bitchko

    Quitali Bitchko The Punisher Full Member

    476
    2
    Sep 28, 2009
    Thats a joke right? :think
     
  3. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    :huh


    I have Holmes in my Tier3 together with Lewis, which is 4 or 5 on a list.

    edit: somehow I wrote Louis instead of Lewis first.:oops:
     
  4. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    :good Yey me too thats how mine starts
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,671
    27,383
    Feb 15, 2006
    Depends on the criteria.

    Based on resume I would have to say no.

    Not unless you think that the 80s was some super era where the top contenders were better than the champions from other eras.

    Basede on head to head it is up to you.

    Personaly I think that Holmses style cuts both ways. He had the tools to give anybody problems but I don't think he would have had an easy time with anybody in your top 20 all time heavyweight list.

    I sincerely doubt that he is the most effective heavyweight of all time head to head even though it might look theoreticaly plausible on paper.
     
  6. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Only 2nd to Louis in title defenses and Louis didnt exactly defend against great opposition either . Actually Holmes has a better resume than most great heavys and some of those 80s heavyweights might not have been atgs but lot of them were still pretty good.
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Well, Louis at least beat some atgs and borderline atgs in Schmeling, Sharkey, Baer, Conn, Lewis, Walcott, Bivins and with Schmeling, Sharkey, Carnera, Baer, Braddock and Walcott also 6 lineal champs. Holmes defeated a done Ali, never-hasbeen Leon Spinks as former champs and perhaps an old Norton as a fighter of note/borderline great. That's hardly comparable.
     
  8. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,255
    Feb 6, 2009
    he's in my top 5
     
  9. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    You are avoiding the real truth here

    Schmeling Very good but not an atg
    Sharkey very good not great cruiserweight
    Carnera Come on:patsch Cooney would dust him fast
    Baer Great Puncher not that good of a boxer
    Conn Great fighter and top 5 LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT
    Braddock Good fighter nothing special
    Walcott Very good win for Louis lucky to get decision first time

    Norton Fought very good in this fight and IMO probably top 20
    Shavers 2x Greatest puncher ever and Holmes almost shut him out in both fights despite getting a scare.
    Weaver Good puncher good fighter.
    Berbick if you brought up Carnera ill bring up Berbick who was awkward and good
    Cooney Very good win against ferocious puncher and Very Capable Big
    man
    Witherspoon Good win against talented and hungry future champ
    Mercer good win over much younger top contender when Holmes was an old man.

    Louis 25 title defenses
    Holmes 20 title defenses and undeafeated in his prime


    Im not saying Holmes resume was any better than Louis's but im just pointing out that its close or similar. And I even skipped the controversial loss to Spinks II. Or wins against Bonecrusher,Snipes, and others. Since i know that Louis beat some other good top contenders also. That you didnt mention.
     
  10. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Norton, Shavers, Weaver, Berbick, Cooney, Witherspoon and Mercer never were champs. Beltholders but no champs. Schmeling, Sharkey, Carnera, Baer, Braddock, Walcott on the other hand were all champs. Beating them does more for your resume than beating the former.
    Schmeling is in my Top13 at hw and an atg btw. I admit I'm biased because he is my idol but I'm ready to defend hat claim against all comers :hey And I doubt there are many who know more about that guy and his career than me.

    The only guys I menioned are atgs, borderline atgs or lineal champs. Because beating these does most for your resume. And there is a huge gap between Louis and Holmes. Don't get me wrong I rate Holmes highly, Top4-5, but there is class-gap between Louis/Ali and him.
     
  11. junior-soprano

    junior-soprano Active Member Full Member

    1,174
    7
    Aug 1, 2009
    i have him at no 3. and like someone said before h2h he also has a very very good chance against everybody. holmes was one off the most intelligent HW there was. a perfect jab. smart fighter.
     
  12. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I think Holmes could beat every hw including Ali, Louis and Marciano. On the other hand I wouldn't make him a big favourite over any great hw. He could lose to a lot of them also.
     
  13. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,530
    11,047
    Jul 28, 2009
    ...I forgot this is ESB and the thickest sarcasm can be completely believable. :lol:
     
  14. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,255
    Feb 6, 2009
    i couldn't see holmes beating ali.he'd beat louis maybe and be too good for marciano
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    It's spelled L-O-U-I-S :yep