Larry Holmes decisions Cassius Clay.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Il Duce, Nov 26, 2010.


  1. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,347
    10,843
    Jul 28, 2009
    Then please explain Rocky VS Mason Dixon, hotshot. :bart
     
  2. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    ali's jab was lightening v liston in 64. holmes can beat him - in his dreams :)
     
  3. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    45
    Nov 18, 2010
    Alis jab was lightening-quick, no doubt.
    But don't always go by the Liston fight.

    Sonny was slow and ponderous at times.
    He only moved forward, never side-to-side.
    His footwork was below-average 'at best'.
    He didn't bend to avoid punches, he leaned down and forward.
    His arms 'muscle-mass' were big and heavy, making it difficult to keep them up in
    front of his face.
    Thats just a start.
     
  4. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,599
    6,637
    Oct 18, 2009
    I'd back prime Ali against a prime Holmes.
     
  5. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    45
    Nov 18, 2010
    On the Renaldo 'Mr.' Snipes vs. Holmes.

    Renaldo Snipes lived right near me in Westchester County.
    I saw him fight many times in White Plains, New York.
    The guy was awkward, but did throw a wild right hand.

    At 25-years old, 6' 2" and 215 lbs. he was a 'live' opponent for Larry Holmes.
    Unbeaten in 22 fights, and with (11 KO's) he was not an easy guy to fight.

    None of Ali's first (8) defenses had that kind of 'live' opponent.
    Young, strong, unconventional, and unbeaten.
     
  6. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    I dont see it.Ali was better.These computer stat things are bollocks.
     
  7. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    416
    Sep 25, 2005
    Larry had a shortcoming he never overcame and its not well known because most heavies aren't movers like Ali was. When facing a moving target Larry would step after them without throwing punches until they stopped, then he would set himself and deliver. Even in the awful bout he had with Ali whenever Muhammad would move slowly around the ring Larry would just follow without throwing a single punch until Ali would stop. Ali in his prime would have used his movement and Larrys weakness in that area to take most of the rounds and the decision.
     
  8. joebeadg

    joebeadg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,909
    1,016
    Dec 3, 2005
    Ali was good, but Holmes would kick his ass! I think Holmes would jab would make ali's useless, but Larry would have top beware of Ali's counter right. Holmes would batter him.
     
  9. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    45
    Nov 18, 2010
    It looks like the Gentro-Computer was using some combination of fights to determine the winner.
    Only Ali's fights from 63' thru 67', were calculated.

    He lost points for not fighting;
    1966,, Eddie Machen,,47-6-3 (29 KO's),, (33) 6' 0" 192 lbs.
    1966,, Amos Lincoln,, 38-5-0 (24 KO's),, (30) 6' 2" 205 lbs.
    1966,, Thad Spencer,, 30-5-0 (13 KO's),, (23) 5' 11" 197 lbs.
    1967,, Leotis Martin,, 24-1-0 (14 KO's),, (28 6' 1" 198 lbs.
    1966,, Doug Jones ,, 24-4-1 (14 KO's),, (29) 6' 0" 195 lbs.
    1967,, Eduardo Corletti 23-2-5 (13 KO's),,(26) 6' 1" 198 lbs.
     
  10. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,795
    11,772
    Jan 6, 2007
    Nope.

    He's generally underrated in those years.

    Even by his fans.
     
  11. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    45
    Nov 18, 2010
    I think what the computer was stating, is that;
    Any combination of Machen, Lincoln, Spencer, Martin, Jones or Corletti
    were better than George Chuvalo, Brian London, Henry Cooper or
    Cleveland Williams.

    The computer also has Renaldo Snipes as a more dangerous fighter than any of Ali's first 8 defenses.
    Not better fighter, just more dangerous (based on youth, strength, size, unbeaten record, and right hand power).
     
  12. alexvoce

    alexvoce Guest

    finally some people on here agree with me and not on the whole ali hype train. Ali was good but also the most overrated boxer of all time holmes would beat him.

    Also a 71 frazier would beat any version of Ali. Prime Tyson puts Ali in hospital.
     
  13. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    No fighter is unbeatable. Ali was more dominant in the 60s, yes, because he fought inferior opposition. No Frazier, no Foreman, no Norton, no Young but a Mildenberger, Cooper, London, Jones.
     
  14. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    45
    Nov 18, 2010
    alexvoce,

    Very good point. 1971 version of Joe Frazier beats the best Cassius Clay
    1963-1967 era.

    Have to laugh, watching Karl Mildenberger back-up Clay pretty much the whole fight
    in 1966.
    Also, hurting him with a body punch.
    How hard a puncher was Mildenberger. In his previous 27 fights, (4) big knock-outs.
    I wouldn't say Holmes wins easy, that would be a crazy statement.
    But Holmes wins a razor-thin decision.
     
  15. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009