Larry Holmes was in his prime when Tyson beat him(Read the post first)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by slicksouthpaw16, Apr 27, 2008.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,885
    44,666
    Apr 27, 2005
    Spinks had quite possibly the best trainer and strategist in history beside him and was unbeaten. If this wasn't enough nobody and nothing was going to be IMO. I don't doubt his potential to rise and possibly defeat any man at 175 in history, but i can name 10 at least he was never going to beat at Heavyweight IMO. Tyson wasn't an overconfident over the hill Holmes, he was a well oiled fighting machine at his (hindsight) peak.
     
  2. Sizzle

    Sizzle Active Member Full Member

    1,293
    21
    Mar 4, 2006
    Half of the time better than none of the time :lol: :lol:
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,885
    44,666
    Apr 27, 2005
    Well why did you say that he did

    Little wonder The Pea is pissed, you're a blatant liar :lol:
     
  4. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Yeah, no doubt about it. Spinks was the biggest marquee fight of Tyson's career up until the first Holyfield fight, hence your "fanfare" statement. And he was a decent operator at heavyweight, perhaps underrated. I must admit I was impressed with how easily Spinks dealt with Cooney. But fighters like Tucker and Ruddock had the natural weight, power, and were closer to their primes than Spinks. Ring generalship and pure skills, Spinks edges them both slightly at heavyweight.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,885
    44,666
    Apr 27, 2005
    Can't argue much on this one.
     
  6. punchy

    punchy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,801
    10
    Oct 10, 2005
    It was only Douglas who had arguably the best jab in the division at the time that was effective. Holmes was not in his prime though.
     
  7. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    I don't think Holmes was as far past his prime as many believe when he fought Tyson. He was definitely over-the-hill and past his prime, but how far past it was he?

    In the second Spinks fight - in April of 1986 - Holmes showed that he was still a very strong and capable fighter. He looked pretty sharp and solid in that fight. So, from April 1986 until roughly the Summer or Fall of 1987 when the Tyson fight was signed, Holmes was inactive. Holmes was not inactive for two solid years prior to fighting Tyson as many people claim; it was more like 14 or 15 months.

    And Holmes himself even said before the Tyson fight that he thought the layoff would benefit him somewhat...It was only after Tyson starched him that Holmes started moaning about how the layoff affected him and was detrimental to his chances; before the fight his tune was totally different.

    So, I doubt that Holmes was going to deteriorate THAT much from April of 1986 until January of 1988. He was only inactive for a little over a year before he started training for the Tyson fight.
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,559
    16,066
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol::good

    That was ****ing awesome! Too bad Larry wasn't better prepared for that one. Larry actually started performing better a few years after the Tyson bout. I still love the way he used every trick in the book to out-wit Mercer.

    :smoke
     
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,559
    16,066
    Jul 19, 2004
    I doubt it.

    :smoke
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Its alright, im explainin' mysellf a bit poorly i think!! They are top wins at the time, and make for a very very good resume. Its just the usage of the word 'elite', thats all, i personally reserve that term for the very finest fighters/achievers in a division's history.

    I understand others use the term in a different context, but in fairness i did explain my own definition if you like of the word before Ironchamp posted his argument disagreeing with my post.
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    I dobut your dobut. :rasta
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,154
    25,374
    Jan 3, 2007
    I think he was pretty well shot myself. Going without a single fight in two years, is a long time for a 38 year old going in against a peak champion in his prime. You also don't have to look very far back to see that Holmes was slipping. The Williams, Smith and Witherspoon fights showed telltale signs of deterioration, and keep in mind, this was still a younger and more active fighting Holmes. Larry's best years were arguably between 1978-1982. From 1983-1986, he was heading down hill. By 1988, and after not having fought in two years, he was pretty much a shell of himself. Holmes best fight weight was around 212-217. In fact, the Witherspoon fight of early 1983 would be that last time that he was able to keep his weight under 220. He was about 225 against Tyson which isn't a collosal difference, but you could still see the pouch around his waste. He was out of shape..

    His comeback showed that he was still capable of putting on boxing gloves, but we can't get too carried away over it, nor use it to justify that he wasn't shot against Tyson. For one thing, he merged himself back into the game by taking on easy opponents, and mainly sticking to fighters which best suited his style. Even Ray Mercer although a great win, was more handpicked as top raters go, and Holmes even said he wanted to avoid the Ruddock's and the Witherspoons. This is a huge difference from coming out cold after a two year layoff and fighting the very best in the world, not to mention, a deadly puncher which is the worst type of fighter for a veteran on the comeback trail to face right away.
     
  13. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I agree, I'll end this right here. Everyone on this forum is against him and he's still deluding himself into thinking he's not fully ******ed, which is obviously ridiculous.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,125
    Jun 2, 2006
    Exvcellent stuff!
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,885
    44,666
    Apr 27, 2005
    Ah ok, much clearer now. Cheers teeto.