Last 3 rounds of Froch vs Dirrell. How'd you score it??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Danny_Rand, Dec 20, 2009.


  1. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Well Danny I had the same card as you.

    Froch lost the fight but got a hometown gift, plain and simple.

    Froch vs kessler needs to be billed as "the fighters who were thoroughly outboxed by prospects superfight".

    :rofl
     
  2. CharlieGarbs

    CharlieGarbs Guest

    Cubex, Dirrell definetly won round 10 (9-9 as for the point deduction), watch the round again and your opinion might change?
     
  3. lfc18titles

    lfc18titles Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,988
    0
    Dec 11, 2009
    i already explained earlier i am certain if you find a site with the stats of that 12th round froch landed more punches, end of the day you do get scored for landing more punches all tho the rule says clean punches

    dirrel may have landed the cleaner hits but in terms of ring generalship and effective aggression, they are for sure go to froch. the body slam? dirrel was play acting, like i said he was acting like a *****, i actually thought at one time he was trying to suck froch's **** when he kept putting his head down there

    like i said

    is dirrel a more talented boxer? yes

    did dirrell do enough to comprehensively beat the champ? no

    dirrell and his corner got their tactics totally wrong, throwing very few punches and getting hit with soft hits sometimes will backfire. froch kept landing small hits and they do count even if we dont want them to

    this kinda reminds me of de la hoya and mayweather, de la landed clean hits but mayweather won that fight due to the quantity of punches. dirrel has only himself to blame but the good thing is he has a few fights left to make right the wrongs
     
  4. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    I didn't think he was stunned or at least in my definition of stunned.He came right back.

    Except that 1 right hand Dirrell didn't do much.Neither did Froch but I thought he landed the few more good punches.
     
  5. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    To lazy to watch it now.

    Will wath it later though.
     
  6. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    To Danny
    How can u tell him how to score when he scored same as all 3 JUDGES, maybe you should learn to score and please accept Froch won lol. End of the day if Froch as bad and lucky as you all say then he is for sure gonna be beat in next two fights. Why not try to bide your time, stop crying and be ready to say you told us so.
    On a side note im not a Froch nuthugger and personally didnt think EITHER fighter deserved to win the fight. Dirrell fought like a school girl and Froch like a drunken thug. The belt should have been stripped and chucked into the crowd in hope it fell to a more deserving boxer. I will reserve final judgement for Dirrel and Froch till after all three fights tho incase they improve :)
     
  7. PikeMc

    PikeMc Member Full Member

    240
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    Dirrel won. But do I care that he didn't get the decision, yes actually, Im glad he didn't. I was rooting for Froch but would happily have seen Dirrel won if he hadn't wasted my entire night by boxing like a total gimp.

    Maybe that will be a wake up call to him to actually use his talent rather than run around like a big girl.
     
  8. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    Froch is a C+ fighter...Dirrell won this fight...Abraham or Ward could KO ***** ass Froch
     
  9. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    There is no such thing in boxing rules that stipify that you have to "take the belt" from the champion. What does that even mean exactly? Knock out? Seriously hurting the other guy? Then I guess Sugar Ray Leonard in your opinion didnt do enough to beat Hagler? Mayweather didnt do enough to beat Oscar? Sorry, that is not how you score title fights. You score it like you score every other fight, punch to punch, round to round. If one fighter lands more punches and wins more rounds he wins the title.

    Dirrell pretty much fought the perfect fight. outboxed Froch in the earlier rounds, and dominated him in the championship rounds.

    Point out which 6 rounds you gave Froch. Im telling you right now, you'll struggle
     
  10. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    What will you say if dirrell loses both his remaining fights and froch wins his?
     
  11. lfc18titles

    lfc18titles Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,988
    0
    Dec 11, 2009
    dirrell in no shape or form fought the right fight

    if you honestly think that then i am out of this thread and i guess others go as well as this guy is just being biased. sorry danny, i think dirrell shaded the fight but if you cant see his poor tactics, holding, bitching, play acting and blatant breaking of the rules cost him the fight then you are just being biased

    you also just said "If one fighter lands more punches and wins more rounds he wins the title."

    well i just saw the 12th round, froch landed more
     
  12. CharlieGarbs

    CharlieGarbs Guest

    Wouldn't go as far as to say he's a C+ fighter, I think he's a very decent belt holder, but nothing more. He does have a great win over Pascal, and then first defence abroad to JT, and has now joined the SuperSix.
     
  13. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    There are even people who think froch and AA where losing against JT till the KO, you wont convince this crowd:(
     
  14. DAGOBOY

    DAGOBOY Active Member Full Member

    1,330
    0
    Oct 6, 2007

    why does that even matter unless you are giving an unfair bias to the champion for no real reason. he beat him even though it was a tough fight.

    when a champ excepts a fight he has given it up and is basically fighting to keep it. the two are on even ground and there should be no benefit of the doubt because he is the champion.
     
  15. Danny_Rand

    Danny_Rand Slick N Quick Full Member

    9,989
    2
    Jun 28, 2008
    Dirrell lands 10 clean punches. Froch lands maybe 4 if you are really reaching.

    Sorry, there is no way in hell Froch outlanded Dirrell in the 12th.

    Froch's aggression was not effective. For Froch's aggression to be effective he'd have to have altered something in Dirrells offense. He didnt. He consistently missed wildly, got caught big and basically Dirrell was able to move around the ring and pick his spots to engage at will. There is no way that Froch won on effective aggression.

    Again, you are merely reaching. You admit Dirrell landed cleaner punches, but then try to make up the excuse that Froch was more effective. Sorry, that doesnt even make sense



    Froch clearly slammed Dirrell to the ground. He even admitted he had to resort to using dirty tactics like rabbit punching becuause he couldnt hit Dirrell


    There is no such thing. Go on the internet right now and find me where in the boxing rules it states you have to "comprehensively beat the champ"

    Nowhere, whoever lands more punches, wins more rounds, wins the fight. That simple. Dirrlel landed more punches, was better defensively, and even had Froch hurt at one point in the fight. If you score the fight correctly how boxing is supposed to be scored, there is no way Froch wins or even draws.

    Sorry, Oscar threw more punches, Mayweather connected on the higher percentage both cleanly and otherwise. You should rewatch that. Dirrell actually landed more punches on Froch then Mayweather did on Oscar btw.