Last 3 rounds of Froch vs Dirrell. How'd you score it??

This just like the calzaghe and hopkins debate, Why cant some people just accept defeat.

 

Man Dirrell beat the **** out of Froch in those last rounds.

 

so malignaggi shouldve agreed with the gift diaz got the first time around?

defeat is okay but getting ripped off and excepting it isnt.

point being he stood up for it didnt roll over and take it and got the rematch and revenge.

 

man why cant americans have a bit more class, some i meet are class acts and i can really have a good debate but people who refuse to see their fighters flaws is what really pisses me off

i honestly think you need to sit next to 3-4 neutral boxing fans and they will prove you wrong. you only see the good dirrell does, not the bad. you only see the bad froch does, not the good.

anyway peace out, i certainly am over this fight, i suggest you do the same. btw first you say number of punches and then quickly change to clean hits when it suits you? make up your mind

if you still cant see the flaws dirrell made in his play acting, trying to get head and so on then specsavers is your friend mate. no froch didnt admit slamming him to the ground, stop making up lies to suit your fcking argument. anyway just get over it, most other people certainly are, peace out.

 

It moved him a bit.Can't score a round over 1 punch.

I''ll watch it again later and comeback.

Who cares anyway?Dirrell won the fight either way.

 

americans are biased and you are not? sure:good you dont like dirrel or his style so you ignore what he did well. froch did admit in the interview to having to use dirty tactics to get to dirrel because he had no other answer.

 

Scored it same as the thread starter:

Round 10 - 9-9 Even
Round 11 - 10-9 Dirrell
Round 12 - 10-9 Dirrell

From memory those rounds aren't really debatable.

 

Yes it moved him a bit which the gif shows.

But watching it again I'd say Dirrell won it yeah.

 

It also shows how dirty Froch is and was never given a warning. That point deduction was pure BS.

Froch was lucky that Dirrell was very green and it showed in this fight, If he had at least 1 more year he would dominate Froch.

 

so what do you class pascal and taylor then?

 

You are ignoring the 10 point must system. What the rule means...is that there must be 10 points awarded to the winner of the round. The only way that round could be even, is if Dirrell won it by two points. He may have won it apart from the deduction but you would only have given it to Dirrell 10-9, not the 10-8 required, to make it a 10-10 round.

Point being...Dirrell did not do enough in the rest if the round, under the 10 point must system rules. Ignoring the deduction, he did not win the round 10-8.

 

Not by dominating the rest of the round it can't.