Last 3 rounds of Froch vs Dirrell. How'd you score it??

What did Froch do that Dirrell Didn't? Andre was all over the place he must have fallen over about 4 times and he was running all night a completely negative performance from a boxer who made an otherwise exciting fighter look dull.

 

You've got to truly dominate the rest of the round. Dirrell didn't.

 

Didnt Dirrell himself concede the 12th to Froch????

 

10-8 froch don't see how anyone can give someone a round based off of one punch, vs a series of punches

10-9 Dirrell Dirrell landed more clean punches

10-9 froch Neither fighter landed anything significant, Just Froch threw more insignificant punches. arguably a 10-10 round, but I think by rules I must give it to someone and Froch threw more and actually landed some, nothing significant though I remind you.

 

I could care less about either fighter, and you must be Blind... "beat him into the ropes and nearly out of the ring" please...atsch

 

You're wrong. Ten point must system means that ten points must he awarded to the winner of the round. Points deductions by the referee are then taken into account. For the round in question, if you give the round to Froch your score is 10-8, if you give the round to Dirrell your score is 9-9.

A number of people try to apply the same principle to knockdowns which is completely incorrect, however for points deductions for infringements, this is the correct procedure.

 

Giving Froch 2 of the last three rounds really show a bias to Froch.

Keith

 

10- Dirrell
11- Dirrell
12- Froch

I can't believe I made myself watch a portion of that fight again, but there it is.

Anyone who makes that fight out to be a schooling or masterclass ought to get peckerslapped. I don't plan on ever seeing the whole thing start to finish again, all I can hope is that both guys put on better fights in the future.

 

you conveniently leave out the other 9 rounds when dirrell was an embaressment.

 

3 rounds does'nt win a fight,that *** ran quicker than a wizard impersonator at a black panther rally, i thought he was pissed for the first half of the fight! does he suffer from narcolepsy?? he tasted more canvas than butterbeans wife being done doggy style!! the gaylord was still holding onto froch after the fight was done! if he'd have stood toe to toe like pascal did he would have got knocked the **** out smokey and he knew it! froch is a warrior direll is an american bandit,carl was throwing the god bothering 5o cent reject around like a transexual ragdoll.....

danny you *** you're like a scratched record,direll lost because he refused to go after the title,get back to us when abraham has his say....

 

scored that fight 114-113 for Froch. Was less a robbery than Williams vs Martinez or Guzman vs Funeka

 

i don't ever wanna watch another Dirrell fight after that...he's a joke. Technically miles ahead of the predictable Froch, but if every fighter fought like Dirrell did that night, boxing would be one of the most boring sports. For that reason alone i think the right fighter won..

 

:good

 

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=097570&cat=boxer



STOP BREATHING MY OXYGEN,IDIOTS.

 

dirrell won the fight...it was in england so he didn't get the dec..if it were in america he wins 116-111 around there