Well, you contradict yourself. Pacquiao can't apply here as he has taken a L in the last 5 (two, actually). And being that you cite Pac's decision loss more than an actual victory, you are disqualifying Bradley as well, saying that he has an essential loss.
Not exactly. I was using Pacquiao as an example to point out that sometimes losing is more impressive than winning and I'm not disqualifying Bradley because whether you go by results, performances or both, Bradley still deserves to be up there.
Its pretty much in the order you have it from right to left. Floyd fought and beat the number 1 guy at LMW in cotto and the champ at the same division (a weightclass above him). He also beat SSM after one of his biggest wins in Margocheato. he Also beat multi divisional titlist in Ortiz and the ghost who were coming off of big wins. All of SSM, Cotto and Saul were all talked about as the boogieman before he fought them. Everyone became a cherry pick after he schools them.
So of guys who DONT cherry pick in your opinion, who has a better record (Would be resume not record actually) than Ward, Mayweather and Bradley?
5 wins spread out over 4 yrs, and that's IF he fights before June. Yes he's dominated, but he ducked his biggest threat when he rose to #1. Froch took the fight and took Bute's soul........ Ward ought to be thanking his lucky stars. IMO....Froch<Ward, resumewise.......and H2h.:good