Last heavyweights of note w/ sub-70inch reaches?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Dec 4, 2016.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,571
    Jan 30, 2014
    Who were the last decent heavyweights with reaches of 69 inches or shorter?
     
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,633
    Mar 17, 2010
    Isnt Marciano the only notable HW champ with that short of a reach?

    His short reach was like a freak scenario for the heavyweight divison. And he figured out how to use it to his advantage by getting extra leverage with his inside punches.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,533
    27,143
    Feb 15, 2006
    There have been a few in the 71'' category.

    Sometimes abnormalities are rare just because they are abnormalities.

    For example when will we see another welterweight champion under 5' 2''?
     
    reznick likes this.
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,571
    Jan 30, 2014
    Probably, but I'm not only looking for champions (or even top contenders). Fringe contenders would suffice. Anyone who was taken seriously on a national level as a heavyweight boxer.
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2016
  5. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,463
    Jan 10, 2007
    Tua had 69'' reach and KO'd many good HW's. Now it's changed to 70'' on boxrec.
     
    reznick and mrkoolkevin like this.
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,533
    27,143
    Feb 15, 2006
    You get abnormalities in the sport.

    Marciano's 5' 10'' height was short, but not an abnormality for a heavyweight.

    His 185-190lb weight was low, but not an abnormality for a heavyweight.

    His reach probably was an abnormality for a heavyweight.

    The answer is probably that we have not seen one, simply because it is a rarity, even among small heavyweights.

    However, he made it work!
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,566
    Nov 24, 2005
    It's impossible to know unless you've measured them all.
    Tale-of-the-tape isn't an officially procedure, as far as I know.
     
  8. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,571
    Jan 30, 2014
    True but official or unofficial, I'd still appreciate the names of any fighters who had respectable careers as heavyweights with reaches listed at 69-inches or shorter...
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2016
    RockyJim likes this.
  9. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,345
    Jun 29, 2007
    Who was the last heavyweight to be ranked in Ring Magazine's top ten with less than a 75" reach?

    I researched. Chagaev in 2009.

    It seems like the hard line requirements to be a heavyweight in 2016 are 215+ pounds, 6 foot or taller with a 75" reach.

    If one of the three triangle numbers are off by a small amount, you can still get by, but you better have a solid amateur background, power, and durability.
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,566
    Nov 24, 2005
    David Tua and Rocky Marciano.
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  11. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,071
    17,580
    Apr 26, 2006
    edit
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2016
  12. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,633
    Mar 17, 2010
    I know you're asking about past world class fighters.

    But there's a modern prospect named Constatin Bejenaru who fights at HW and CW with a 67" reach.
    http://boxrec.com/boxer/577153

    Not sure if that's interesting to you.
    Interestingly, he's not a KO artist.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,745
    21,367
    Sep 15, 2009
    In general the infighting aspect of boxing is much poorer than it used to be.

    Not sure if it's due to style, training or accumulated damage but no one wants to slug it out on the inside.

    Kind of makes a short reach a massive handicap if your plan is to fight at range.

    Fighters with short reach tend to be those who leap into the left hook as a means of cutting the distance instantly, this becomes very difficult if your opponent is determined to stay at range and is the physically bigger fighter, it becomes impossible when clinching is allowed.

    Tua, Rocky, Frazier and Tyson all spring to mind.

    As long as clinching is prevalent HW boxing will be won by the man who is the strongest in the clinch providing he can beat you to the punch at range.
     
  14. GoldenHulk

    GoldenHulk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,613
    5,142
    Jan 7, 2007
    Lionel Butler was ranked in the top 10 back in the 90's and his wingspan was only about 70 inches.
     
  15. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,633
    Mar 17, 2010
    Watching Bejenaru is interesting an somewhat illuminating.

    He's a boxer with a 67" reach, and has been fighting guys bigger than him with better reach.

    He uses his short reach to lets punches fly fast. People rarely talk about how a shorter reach gives your punches less travel time.

    https://streamable.com/korg