Last nights Fury ,Which Lineal Champ s does he beat ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Dec 2, 2018.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Marciano has t-Rex arms? Well Fury has a butter bean belly.

    Wilder was 42lb lighter than Fury, and was playing the stalker role.

    Fury had to avoid his punches like they were death threats.

    Marciano is one of the hardest and greatest punchers of all time. The same level as Wilder.

    Wilder proved the classicists argument that an elite power puncher could negate a massive size difference, EVEN if the SHW in question is elite and skilled. Our argument was proven with a real life example, while the modernists keep slipping and landing with their faces in poo. And are forced to refine their arguments into sillier and sillier territory.

    Now weight doesn’t matter if the guy is tall! Lol. If Wilder was 6”2 they would make up something else.

    The kind of pressure Wilder used is easier to deal with for a slickster than a genius inside fighter is. Countless examples tell us that. If Wilder could catch Fury bad in the 12th with the stamina level he had, Marciano is catching him with a barrage of hell.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    I also find it disingenuous to measure Fury's best as the Cunningham fight when it's clear he would fight down to the level of his opposition.

    A lot of people thought Chisora, Wlad, and Wilder would all knock him out because they took his floor and rated it as his ceiling. That's a mistake with some fighters, and Fury is one of them. He rises to the occasion and is a clutch fighter.

    Nobody has an easy night with him. The classic 6 foot, 190-200 lb heavyweights would be in for one of the most discouraging nights of their lives against him because of the generalship, reach, upper body movement, size, and patience Tyson brings to the table.
     
  3. chatty

    chatty Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,413
    1,067
    Aug 18, 2009
    Be interesting to see Fury in with smarter accumulation fighters than he's fought so far. Usyk, Joshua, Whyte, Ortiz and Povetkin would be all fights I'd like to see.

    He dominated Hammer and Chisora but ain't think most of those guys bring a different level to them.
     
    Sting like a bean likes this.
  4. Sting like a bean

    Sting like a bean Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,047
    1,594
    Apr 9, 2017
    I think it's too late to learn anything from fights with Ortiz or Povetkin, but prime for prime that would be quite instructive.
     
  5. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Can we wait a bit more? Its clear Wilder skills are average, and he's a bad boxer by top ten standards today. Outside of landing 3 big shots, one of which Fury barely survived, I'd call him a game man, but not a very durable one.

    Fury won, but was close to losing. His signature win remains over a 39 year old Wlad.

    I think I have seen enough to pick Fury over the smaller boxer types without much power. Jim Corbett, Jack Johnson, Jack Sharkey, Ezzard Charles, those types...

    I think I have seen enough to pick him over the semi skilled super heavyweight not know for defense. Jess Willard or Primo Carnera.

    Whether he can beat a skilled super heavyweight or aggressive puncher in his prime remains to be seen.
     
  6. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,622
    36,198
    Jan 8, 2017
    Joshua for certain ,I'll be well peed off if that fight never happen s ie Lewis v Bowe,Tyson v Foreman ..
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,652
    46,303
    Feb 11, 2005
    Are we still trying to run the argument up that flagpole that a 6 foot 8 dude with an 85" is in some way analogous to a 5 foot 10 dude with a 67" reach?

    Please. Take a different tact. This one is embarrassing.
     
    Rock0052 and Pat M like this.
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    No, pretending like size hasn’t been predicated on WEIGHTclasses forever is the true laughing matter.

    Hearns was never a true WW! He was too tall! Lol
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,652
    46,303
    Feb 11, 2005
    Would Wilder be as successful at 212 if he were sub 6-foot and sub-70" reach?... That would still put him 25 pounds over Marciano's weight but let's focus on his dimensions first.
     
    Pat M likes this.
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Come on. Wilder's success tells us absolutely nothing useful about how a 5'10/185lb/67-in Marciano would fare in today's heavyweight division and you know it.
     
    Seamus, Rock0052 and Pat M like this.
  11. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Except that it does.
    There was a strong census on this forum that there will never be a sub 220lb HW champion ever again. There was no asterisk about reach, height, or anything for that matter. As a matter of fact, it was said that if anything, the smaller HW would have to be extremely elusive to have a chance. But that being a huge hitter would’ve been superfluous as the big SHWs would’ve been too strong for that to even matter. There were a few of us contending that fighters like Dempsey, Louis and Marciano were of a special class of power that would overpower almost all modern SHWs. This argument received a large amount of ridicule.

    Well here you have it. A 212lb fighter is the most dangerous puncher and finisher in the modern HW division, has a belt, and had a draw with the lineal champion. Boom.

    Hastily brushing off the inaccurate argument by referring to Wilders height and reach reveals a laziness and lack of accountability by the bearers of that argument. You can all pretend like you have amnesia and completely forgot about one of the main arguments of the classic board, but I’m not.
     
    PhillyPhan69 and BitPlayerVesti like this.
  12. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    It's funny how a lot of tall fighters of the past were considered uncomparible to modern heavyweights because they were beanpoles too.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Uhm, why the hell not? He’d probably have to change his style a bit in accordance to his dimensions.

    His psyche, intuitiveness, power, finishing instinct, and dedication to his craft are faaar greater factors to his success than his height and reach. How many fighters out there have long arms and are tall? Plenty. How many fighters out there can hit like Deontay Wilder?
     
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Can you cite/quote some specific posts please? The more the better. I’m not trying to be difficult—I honestly don’t remember ever ordaining a 220-lb weight minimum for all future heavyweight champions. Maybe I was drunk and typing recklessly??

    Are you trying to reduce the arguments against Marciano thriving in today’s division to his weight (namely the fact that he weighs less than 220lbs)? If so, I have a very hard time believing that you’re being sincere as I know that you know better. Those of us who have argued that Marciano would have too tough of a row to hoe in the modern heavyweight division have emphasized his reach, his lack of speed, and his tendency to sustain damage while moving in for his attacks more so than his under-220-pound-ness. If you don’t see how the obvious, glaring physical differences between Wilder and Marciano trump the fact that both men weigh under 220lbs, then discussing it further is probably pointless. Hint: One of them can be standing 6 feet away from you and knock you senseless from long range in the blink of an eye; the other is Rocky Marciano.

    PS — For the record, I think Wilder hits much harder than Marciano. I think that all the Marciano knockout highlight reels have made it hard for people to remember that his small, old opponents usually absorbed an awful lot of punishment from Marciano round after round before eventually being stopped.
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2018
    mcvey, Rock0052 and Pat M like this.
  15. Jamzy ⭐

    Jamzy ⭐ Active Member Full Member

    1,468
    957
    Oct 8, 2018