Last official poll: Gamboa Vs Mtagwa!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Black Bill, Jan 23, 2010.


  1. Black Bill

    Black Bill Member Full Member

    268
    0
    Jul 28, 2009
    OK guys, make your last votes count before tonight's battle between Yuriorkis Gamboa and Roger Mtagwa.

    Things to consider:

    Mtagwa is weighing around 122lbs, but has said that he did'nt train properly for the Lopez fight and that now for Gamboa he has really trained...

    Gamboa looks like a freak of nature all ripped and full of muscles, heck even Lopez looks like a skinny chicken compared to him...

    OK, please vote and be completely honest as after the fight we will come back and see who was right!!!

    My opinion: Gamboa will get Mtagwa out of there in less than 4 rounds!!!
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I think I'm gonna back the upset here.

    Mtagwa, 10th round.

    well that was a terrible pick lol Gamboa was amazingly sharp
     
  3. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    I'm predicting a phenomenal win for gamboa.
     
  4. Black Bill

    Black Bill Member Full Member

    268
    0
    Jul 28, 2009
    Damm, I was really going to post some of the weigh in pics but could'nt, if you see the pictures you will see why Mtagwa said, " please pray for me so that I don't get hurt "... Gamboa looks like a monster.
     
  5. SICK NICK

    SICK NICK Member Full Member

    118
    0
    Oct 23, 2009
  6. Kid Chocolate

    Kid Chocolate Member Full Member

    134
    0
    Jun 11, 2009
    How can some people think that the African has some winning chances just amazes me. Gamboa after tonight will definitely make JuanMa Lopez look " horrible "...Look for Yuriorkis to spectacularly take Mtagwa early by just " 1 punch " !! Yes, I said that!!!
     
  7. brickfists

    brickfists The Nonpareil Full Member

    8,666
    7
    Nov 19, 2008
    i hope rogers wins wat a story it would be