C'mon, man., I know you love Whyte but it's not remotely comparable. Povetkin was 40 and 41, had been fighting at the highest level amateur and pro both as a kickboxer and boxer for about 25 years, had been in more wars than an army, and was shot to bits. He was well past his best before the Hunter fight but his entire mechanism had gone by the time he fought the rematch against Whyte. Whyte is much younger and much fresher with way less miles on the clock.
That's a bit of a weird analogy? This content is protected I've never needed acceptance, and I never expected acceptance on here. Since day 1 it's been Aydamn vs the Forum. I state facts, corroborated by professionals like Roy Jones Jr. Not amateur pub-dwelling, forum members.
Okay then agree to disagree, the convenience level for your argument here is off the charts. Because of one fight... 8 months prior... all of a sudden Povetkin was way to shot for Whyte. If you say so man.
Fighters can and often do get old overnight at that age, let alone at that age after extremely grueling careers after competing in combat sports for almost 30 years, much of it at the highest level, and being involved in more wars than an army and after being involved in yet another one at 40 y/o
if you're unable to see how much Pov had physically declined from fight to fight for the last few years of his career than you either need to get some glasses sorted or stop letting your personal bias interfere with your common sense. I like Whyte, and give him credit for wins that alot of people on here don't give him credit for, such as the Parker win. But Pov was shot when they first fought, and covid left him absolutely ruined when it came time for the rematch.
Hey I am only comparing the 8 month time period between Povetkin vs Hunter and Povetkin vs Whyte. Of course Pov is past prime, but power is the last to go. And he gave a young hungry, strong fighter like Hunter a solid fight. Most of this forum had Hunter above Whyte.
I already told you that Povetkin was well past his best before he fought Hunter. He was declining from fight to fight at that age for goodness sake and that war against Hunter took a lot out of him, as you would expect it would for a 40 y/o at the end of an extremely long and hard career who'd taken an awful lot of damage throughout it and had a million miles on their clock. He looked rickety against Hunter but against Whyte he looked like he'd just been dragged out of the geriatric ward for the first fight and like he'd just been dragged out of a graveyard for the rematch. He could still punch but he was a shell of the fighter he used to be.
Jesus, look at you! Big man. Sitting in your mums house, calling Dillian Whyte shyte. Omg... you're too gangsta. Whyte better watch his back, in case you show up innit.
Yeah Whyte gets shat on quite alot for a guy who has had a good amount of entertaining fights and who has fought a decent list of people. But you only have to look at the fights to see that the Pov that turned up to the rematch was way beyond shot. He was past prime for Hunter and Whyte I. However in that second fight he was a complete shell of what he once was. He was nearly falling over whenever he threw a punch, it was like watching Ali against Berbick, sad as hell.
You don't need to do this to yourself. You're already enough of a melt. You're a bigger clown than Whyte somehow.
Moi the melt? I'm not the plum sitting at home calling professional heavyweight boxers shyte. You're a little boy.