Last time someone dominated a division like Golovkin has?

And *brutally* dominated the top guys there...

Exactly who has Bumlovkin beaten?

 

Eh I can see that, but I don't know you can knock a guy for not facing his brother. He still did beat everybody else in the top 10, some multiple times.

 

Still... It's certainly not dominating an entire division if you only face 3 guys. and one of those guys is Mamadou Thiam.

 

Really? Who that currently fights from 154-168 that you favor to beat him?

 

He never beat Vitali, he never beat Sanders, he never beat Purrity and he didn't beat Brewster until he was out for a year and coming off of *eye surgery*.

Wlad's "reign" @ HW is a J O K E.

 

LMAO.

Trinidad's tenure @ 154 defecates and urinates all over the WHOLE of Bumlovkin's resume.

Fact is, in three fights, Tito laid waste to all that mattered @ 154lbs. That's why he moved up to 160. His business @ 154 was DONE.

 

alright. I'm no expert on Klitschko's reign. I just thought it was consensus that he dominated over the division even if it was a lame division.

 

Really? I didn't know he fought Quartey and Winky Wight at 154?

 

Lara is a LIVE dog
Canelo beats him @ 155, 50/50 fight @ 160
Jacobs UDs him
Jack outboxes him then gets the KO late

 

Trinidad beat the guy who beat Wright and Quartey @ 154lbs, Einstein...

 

Canelo is a maybe.

Lara was almost beat by Angulo

Jacobs has a glass chin

Jack was KO's by Derek Edwards

 

Beating the top guy in the division is not the same as dominating a division.

 

lara beat angulo

angulo stopped Joachim alcine in 1 round

alcine beat david Lemieux

see how easy that was? lol

 

Alvarez has the better resume.

ALMOST? Lol. Why is it you Bumlovkinites are the masters @ bringing up the irrelevant? Lol...

Jacobs has the better resume.

Jack has the better resume..

 

You've convinced me that Lara>lemieux but that's it.