Latest from Fury's UKAD hearing!

Lol. Very very true!

 

I have no doubt the gypsy community is subject to such things however the press only went after for the comments he made.

If AJ had said similar things about Homosexuals, abortion, bisexuals etc etc the press would be after him as well.

Look what happened to Pacquiao after his comments on Homosexuality. He didn't get a pass.

 

Yes he kept his titles as Manny pacquiao never pulled out of defending them or say he had mental health issues with no idea on when he will fight again? He also lost his Nike endorsement deal.

Not really sure where you are going with this? You wanted Fury to be allowed to hold the belts hostage. How would that be good for the division? A champion who isn't fighting.

As for BJS. That dude needs to stop holding the belt hostage and actually fight someone with a pulse. He has nothing to complain about.

 

Stop smoking crack

 

Did someone just say that running the 100 metres in nine and a half seconds was possible naturally?

Fcuk me. Some right mongs in here.

 

Nah you're the idiots who are slandering hardworking athletes without proof, probably to make yourself feel good. We should use your approach to the justice system as well, who needs evidence? Why can't you people just be happy.

 

I'm not unhappy. I like Joshua. But I accept that he is very, very unlikely to be clean.

 

Yeah chances are he's doping. While we don't know for sure it's the more likely scenario than him having a condition like Myostatin related muscle hypertrophy which would explain his impressive physique.

 

The whole everyone is out to get gypsies narrative is false. Who dislikes Andy Lee?
Fury and BJS just have no class, they have reaped what they sowed.

 

And what makes him being doped more likely than say Pulev? Because AJ looks more "ripped" than Pulev? That's ludicrous.

 

Saying I believe 9.58 is drug-assisted isn't really slander. No one is saying Bolt didn't work extremely hard to achieve his times.

I refuse to believe the fastest time ever was achieved drug-free. It makes no sense to believe that.
It's like saying the heaviest deadlift ever was achieved drug-free. Or the guy with the most developed muscles ever is drug-free.

None of the "100% proven" drug-assisted times (that have been struck from the record books) are close to 9.58.

If a "lifetime clean" guy can run significantly faster than every single "drug cheat" in history, drugs wouldn't even be an issue. If it was the case, we could genuinely doubt that the drugs even work.

 

Nothing. I think every top level boxer is enhancing their performance illegally in some form or another.

My point is: I don't care.

 

None of the other very top 100m runners over the decades have had close to Bolts stride length though. That is the main factor why he is so far ahead of everyone else.

 

It's one of those great fallacies held among the clueless that drugs and hard work never go together. The majority of top level athletes who are doped to the gills are tremendously driven athletes. It's the drugs that allow them to train beyond their natural means and achieve the results that they do.

If you just took drugs to cut corners you aren't going to get any real benefits. Not enough to make you the best, unless you're exceptional in other ways.

 

Ok I agree with that notion. We can safely assume virtually all professional athletes are using PEDs in one form or another.

What bothers me if people bring up some big biceps or shoulder muscles and scream "Look -> HE <- must be doping, look how ripped he is". Vascularity, body fat levels or volume of muscles (within limits) don't prove or disprove PED usage.