Hey idiot... Raheem beat Morales in 2005. Pac didn't go to LW until 2008. You have no clue how to do any research.
Once again boxing is ruined can never have “ the best fighting the best” Even when miraculously both fighters & both promoters are willing! some random 3rd party phukko comes to crash our party!! it will never change. unbelievable Why isn’t Jeff Bezos a boxing fan?! he could be our Dana White! “the Savior of boxing” Gawd damn pervert egghead too busy making d!ck shaped rocket ships.
Yeah. One fight left on his deal, they are just waiting to sign him up themselves and then the fights become in-house. Twice the cut for the promoters and they'll still control the winner no matter what. At this point, I do believe TR would be willing. They seem certain to lose him to PBC after the next fight so they'll cash out happily.
Hey dumbass I was saying Pacquiao beat Diaz the weakest champ at that time, Why didn't Pacquiao fought Raheem when he schooled Morales?? Pacquiao knew Morales leges were gone so he went after the loser of that fight instead of the winner, isn't that "corrupt " like you guy's say? Why didn't Pacquiao went after him or Guzman or even Soto that was calling him out for years and beat his little brother in front of him still Pacquiao ignored Soto ??? Imagine the trash Canelo or Mayweather would get if they do that?? But since Pacquiao everything is cool right?
Obviously Pac wanted to avenge his loss to Morales and even before Morales lost to Raheem it had been reported he'd signed a rematch with Morales. Also Raheem would of meant moving up to 134lbs something he wouldn't do for another 3 years. Why didn't he go for Guzman please Guzman wouldn't even fight Scot Harrison when he pulled out of their fight saying he was moving up to super feather but then fought at featherweight in his next fight. Guzman was very unreliable, failing weight, pulling out of fights. Guzman was a good fighter but way too unreliable. Soto after he upset Juarez could of fought Pac I guess but not after he lost to Guzman. Soto wasn't a terrible fighter, he improved a lot from his early losses but come on he was never a threat. Pac fought Morales twice, Barrera, Solis and Larios during that time. Larios was a mandatory so really the only acceptable time he could of fought Soto was instead of Solis. There was really only a small window when there was any interest in this fight and even then fans were't clamouring for it like fights with Morales and Barrera or a rematch with JMM.
Why did he need to fight Raheem after he beat Morales? No one forced Morales to move up in weight and fight a slick spoiler. Has nothing to do with Pac dumb****. how is that corrupt? Do you just say things w/o thinking??? Why didn't...why didn't.... my god...you sound like a stupid child. You just toss out names and thinks that's enough as "research". You prefer simple answers, like a simple minded loser.
Pacquiao is the WBA Champion in recess. No chance the fight gets stopped at best they might be awarded some money and even that is far from certain. In fact they are trying to arrange a fight between Prograis and Mickey.
Of course it's not about stoping the fight but showing they have the power to do it, and to earn money from that.But i don't think it will work.
Unless they have a contract for a fight , this won’t hold up in court. So you paid him several millions to come to the table. That’s money for his time. Time he would otherwise spend making millions in commercial , movies, appearance fee, etc.