Least athletic SUCCESSFUL boxer in history

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Jul 19, 2007.


  1. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005
    I just saying it was his stance, and foot work that made the Rock slow in the ring. He needed to brace his feet, get the footwork NEEDED , and powerful legs to get that knockout power going. If Ali could learn how to do that, he would be a powerful puncher. Most of the power punchers outside of Dempsey or Tyson were pretty slow on foot in regards to heavyweights. Louis, Marciano, and even Foreman were pretty slow on foot.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,489
    46,013
    Feb 11, 2005
    as vague as these supposedly "unathletic" features are, I find them very protean to the concept of what is athletic. skill is only practiced by those who are blessed with the ability to harness their physical components best, heart is often merely a misnomer for stamina and recuperative skills... which leaves us with the amorphous "other factors."

    the term athletic is entirely too vague which is just where it is prefered by those who want argue it in a vacuum.
     
  3. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    56
    Jul 20, 2004
    No, you're dead wrong. Marciano didn't make it to the Major Leagues in baseball(like 99.9% of all players who aspire to make it there), but he was one of the absolute best in his region and a local hero; he only got to the Major League try-outs because he was considered to have a serious chance at being a Major League player. Not only that, but he was an all-start linebacker in football and ran a record touchdown in his local stadium. Marciano was a very athletic guy.
     
  4. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,968
    2,411
    Jul 11, 2005
  5. NickHudson

    NickHudson Active Member Full Member

    894
    21
    Apr 13, 2007
    i think it would be fair to say that strength, speed and stamina are 'pure' athletic qualities that translate across sports.

    are there any boxers that have been succesful, despite deficiencies in one or more of these qualities?

    tony tubbs is a good one, also buster mathis senior.

     
  6. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
  7. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,046
    Oct 25, 2006
    Maybe Tommy Burns? I'm not that familiar with the guy, but I can't recall ever reading anything where he was praised for his athletic prowess.
     
  8. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    But "Worst team ever to win the superbowl" is not an oxymoron. Of all of the teams that ever played in the superbowl and won, one is bound to be worse than the others.
     
  9. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    I'm referring to heart as determination to win, rather than a simple physical ability to sustain punishment. And skill, although I admit that it requires coordination, is more a function of one's ability to grasp how "it's all supposed to work" and practice diligently.

    Athleticism can be defined. One's raw physical abilities--reflex, stamina, speed, power, strength--are generally essential to winning in sports. It would be hard to argue that a guy with blazing reflexes, a national-level 100 meter dash time, powerlifting score, Olympic lifting poundage, and iron man level abilities in marathons would not do well in sports. But boxing is a bit different--it's a skill sport where the fastest, strongest, and otherwise genetically gifted often lose to the fighters who can simply figure out their opponent's style better...as canny old Archie Moore would agree.
     
  10. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    Who in your judgement is the poorest athlete to become heavyweight champion?

    And the best?
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    Hmm...


    Poorest: Jersey Joe Walcott (at the age he was when he acquired the championship...he relied more on skill and weird rhythm than athleticism)

    Best: James J. Jeffries
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,723
    29,071
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tony Galento fought for the Heavyweight title and floored ATG Joe Louis,will that do?
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,723
    29,071
    Jun 2, 2006
    Willie Meehan fat and light hitting gave Dempsey fits.
     
  14. Darthmage

    Darthmage SILENCE! I KEEL J00! Full Member

    864
    1
    Dec 31, 2005
    I was going to say John Ruiz but then again he compensated with things like... hugging so there goes that idea.
     
  15. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Least athletic SUCCESSFUL boxer in history

    His name is Joe Grimm and he feared no man.