Least number of punches thrown in a title fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RDJ, Dec 18, 2009.


  1. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008

    WHATS THAT GOT TO DO WITH ANYTHING

    also england 2 germany 0
    (you started the off boring bull****)
     
  2. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    NO it doesn't.

    quality > quantity
     
  3. RDJ

    RDJ Boxing Junkie banned

    13,158
    9
    Sep 27, 2005
    Because it would have showed he tried to connect, it says something about the fighters intent. In Johnson's case however it was indeed merely flailing his arms towards Vitali instead of truly punching. I admit it's not equal. Haye was a bit less shitty than Johnson.
     
  4. RDJ

    RDJ Boxing Junkie banned

    13,158
    9
    Sep 27, 2005
    It tells me a lot, that the only people defending Haye's shitfest are British, because the only reason you're defending it is chauvinism.

    I'm not German buddy.
     
  5. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    Judges scoring fights on 'workrate' is ruining boxing :twisted:

    Take Williams/ Martinez for example. In round 11 Williams lands 32, Martinez 33. Nobody would argue that Martinez laned the cleaner, more effective punches. Yet Williams, at least according to one judge, wins the round :huh

    Walking forward and flurrying at thin air is NOT effective aggression. You can make an argument in a case like Calzaghe/ Hopkins where one guys is shoeshining and one is throwing only a couple of punches a round, but Martinez and Williams landed the same number of punches.
     
  6. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    No it wouldn't, it would show that his work was less measured, with less thought behind it and he was relying on the law of averages that some of the punches he was flinging about must find the target. Haye's 'intent' was to find the target with every punch, make everyone count and not waste any.

    Again, I fail to see why that is inferior.

    The more we get into this, the more I really start to wonder about what you value in a boxer.
     
  7. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I don't have punch stats, but i'd be surprised if Briggs averaged more than 20 per round against Liakhovic. What a stinker, especially if you consider that Liakhovic' fight before that was perhaps the heavyweight battle of the decade with Brewster.

    Doesn't beat Haye vs Valuev though. That record will stand for a long time.
     
  8. wingchung

    wingchung Active Member Full Member

    1,416
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    Without a doubt Haye. Threw 143 punchs. Pathetic and got the wba title. Evander should be the wba champ. He actually fought and beat Valuev for the title.
     
  9. RDJ

    RDJ Boxing Junkie banned

    13,158
    9
    Sep 27, 2005
    Because the total number is pathetic. By that logic you could throw one single punch, and you'd win the title as long as the other person landed none.

    I expect at least a bit offensive mindedness. Don't get me wrong I like defensive boxing off the back foot, but this went far beyond defensive boxing, it was just being defensive period.
     
  10. Fan2010

    Fan2010 Member Full Member

    256
    0
    Dec 4, 2009
    :thumbsup
     
  11. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    But why would you value 'offensive mindedness' over actually hitting your opponent?

    It doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

    Fighter A throws 400 punches and lands 80.
    Fighter B throws 100 punches and lands 90.

    Which has fought more credibly?
     
  12. wingchung

    wingchung Active Member Full Member

    1,416
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    You expected to much man. I also expected far more.
     
  13. wingchung

    wingchung Active Member Full Member

    1,416
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    Valuev cause he tryed to make a fight happen and Haye ran the whole fight.
     
  14. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    What question do you think you're answering? :?
     
  15. RDJ

    RDJ Boxing Junkie banned

    13,158
    9
    Sep 27, 2005
    I think Haye won, I just don't have any respect at all for the way he did it. Pathetic, embarrassing, those are the terms that come to mind.