Lee Q Murray . Avoided contender ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by frankenfrank, Nov 18, 2011.


  1. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    What does that have 2 do with Cream coming forward ? it is u who use irrelevant stuff 2 supposedly support your claims .
    Or whad d truth is 4 this matter .
    Classic forum classic attitude .
    No wonder Joe Louis but especially Muhammad Ali r considered as greats in here .
    There is so much sig material in this forum , but so little sig space :-(
    Then u should at least consider it as a draw and not a 'beating" of Murray by Bivins , make it Murray vs Bivins 2:1:1 .

    This content is protected
    :yep
    Murray deserved more than them and I don't even try 2 find who they were . Murray deserved it most up to 1947 and including , and 1947 was after d war . Even after d war Louis still had more than a year 2 fight Murray , but he didn't . And he should have fought him during d war like he did with others .
    Yellow - wrong
    Green - correct
    My evidence is Murray's achievements from 1942 up to 1947 compared 2 every other contender of that period .
    He lost 2 Bivins only once , robbed once and outpointed him twice .
    U obviously don't know about his "losses" more than their being listed as such .
    But Louis still had 5 years 2 fight Murray in which he repeatedly chose 2 fight others .