Legacy or Money

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kg0208, Oct 8, 2007.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    i would go for both, but they often go hand in hand
     
  2. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    40
    Nov 19, 2004
    3rd option.

    While "legacy" sounds like the honourable choice, too many exceptional fighters have ended up skint and broken-down for me to think that the money side isn't equally as important. The reality of the situation is that so few fighters ever make it truly to the top of the tree with the big money fights (and some of the still end up broke), that a degree of financial accumen and 'money sense' is utterly crucial for a boxer.
     
  3. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    I would like to get money and legassy.

    Probably like Leonard, Hagler, etc.

    I would not focus only in money, because I would want to be remembered.

    I would not focus only in legassy, because I would probably end up poor. And probably with brain damage like Eric Morales.
     
  4. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    One hand washes the other. Money comes with fighting big names.

    Overral though in like and not on a boxing forum, money is what really matters.
     
  5. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Legacy for me

    You don't really achieve anything legacy wise without fighting big fights and the money comes naturally

    That said, I'd always fight the up and comers I thought were best, rather than past it names just for money. It gets to a point when you have millions and millions, and it becomes nothing more than a figure. What can you do with all that money really? It's nothing more than ego
     
  6. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    the biggest fights add the most to your legacy. The biggest fights bring the most money.

    20 years from now, people will look at Floyds record and say, "wow, check it out, after winning the welterweight title, he beat an atg at a higher weight class."

    If he would've fought Margo they wouldn't even list it as one of his top 10 victories.
     
  7. SgrRyLeonard

    SgrRyLeonard Active Member Full Member

    777
    134
    Jun 4, 2006
    Legacy or a combination of the two. It would probably depend on how good I was. If I was at Mayweather, Pacquiao, or Calzaghe's level, I'd fight the best guys out there; the money would come.
     
  8. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Yes, but what will they say when they see he fought him again with 2 unbeaten WW titlists in his division AND that he hadn't fought a WW since winning the belt. They will wonder if he was ONLY in it for the money.

    He needs to do both. Fighting DLH adds more money than fighting Cotto. How much more? No idea. However, I think the amount of legacy added to PBF for beating Cotto right now as opposed to beating DLH again is greater in significance in the difference of the money he will get from fighting them.
     
  9. bestdefense117

    bestdefense117 Young Gun Full Member

    532
    0
    Feb 1, 2008
    Money lasts till you die but a Lagacy is forever.
     
  10. splatter69

    splatter69 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,727
    1,328
    Aug 4, 2007
    This sums it up perfectly in My opinion.
     
  11. Gonzo

    Gonzo Active Member Full Member

    692
    0
    Jan 25, 2008
  12. elTerrible

    elTerrible TeamElite General Manager Full Member

    11,392
    15
    May 24, 2006
    morales hasnt shown any signs of brain damage that Ive seen
     
  13. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Plenty of greats will tell you legacy does not pay bills.

    Also without wanting to totally blow the thread in the direction, but Hitler and Stalin were both arguably in the top five (maybe even higher) of leagcy makers worldwide in the 20th century...