I would n't really count Cooney as an all time great. He was a pretty good fighter who had a lot of potential,but sadly never fulfilled it. Along with so many other heavyweights of the1980's.
Yes,I go along with this one,if we're talking about guys who were both in their prime,or not far off it.
None of the Ali fights work, unless they were before his exile, because that's his prime. Marciano Moore I was thinking of, but isn't Moore's prime in the light heavyweight division? Louis was actually only 22 years old when he lost to Schmeling. However in his rematch he was 25 years old if im not mistaken. But during the rematch, Schemling was 33 years old. So I don't think I would consider it. If Sharkey was 30 years old when he hit his prime, then Schemling vs Sharkey would work. However I don't know if that is the case or not, so someone will have to shed more light on it. I dont consider Liston vs Patterson prime vs. prime. Liston was 30 years old in their first bout. And thats not even considering the fact that he was probably actually 33 years old. I say Liston was in his prime around 1958, right when he defeated Whitehurst, and was about to start the onslough of Williams. But this is definitely the closest one yet. All of a sudden Foreman vs. Frazier is going up in stock in your guys mind, no? lol
Louis was in his prime against Schmeling the first time around but not at his peak. Same with Schmeling. The second time around Max was past his prime. Baer-Schmeling would fit there. Sharkey-Schmeling the first time fits the bill perfectly, the second time still somewhat but I won´t argue if somebody says Sharkey was a bit past it.
Ali was still not far off his prime though. As I'm always saying,when in shape and focused Ali was the nearest to his '67 peak as he could get between 1972 - 74.
Well norton does NOT rank highly head to head because he's handicapped vs punchers and because he didn't beat anyone that was in their prime. he beat Quarry, Ali, yeah, but these guys were signifficantly faded. Well Ali-Frazier works more then Holmes-Cooney because Cooney was not an ATG or legendary. Ali still looked damn good, and was shoveling those one two's out very well. Foreman-Frazier is still not really a good comparison if you're not going to use the Ali-Frazier comparison. Frazier took batterings in the first Ali fight and the Quarry fight. He was not using his right hand as much as he was using in the Ellis fight or even the first quarry fight. Also his weight increased, and he clearly didn't look as conditioned as he was vs Foster, Quarry, or Ali.
Corbett vs Jackson is the standout, imo The rest fall just short for various reasons: Corbett vs Fitzsimmons Johnson vs Jeanette Langford vs Wills Marciano vs Moore Ali vs Liston I Liston vs Patterson Frazier vs Foreman Holyfield vs Bowe Walcott vs Charles Louis vs Baer Braddock vs Baer Braddock vs Louis Louis vs Schmelling
Really? I thought he must have been pretty damn close in Patterson I, actually i thought he was prime, the only question mark on that fight qualifying would have been the status of Paterson being legendary. Liston was past prime vs Ali, but not that far past prime, being just 6 or so months after his second demolition job on Paterson. It would only just fall short of qualifying. Johansen v Paterson I and perhaps two is another i just thought of too, though i dont know if these two are necessarilly qualifying under the legendary qualification.