Legendary Prime vs Prime (Heavyweight)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Sep 1, 2010.


  1. crippet

    crippet Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,377
    20
    Dec 1, 2007
    How is Bowe an ATG - from winning one fight against a peak Holy

    How about Tyson V Douglas then?:patsch
     
  2. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    Bowe Holyfield is the best one i can think of.
     
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,133
    8,588
    Jul 17, 2009
    I would n't really count Cooney as an all time great. He was a pretty good fighter who had a lot of potential,but sadly never fulfilled it. Along with so many other heavyweights of the1980's.
     
  4. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,133
    8,588
    Jul 17, 2009
    Yes,I go along with this one,if we're talking about guys who were both in their prime,or not far off it.
     
  5. crippet

    crippet Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,377
    20
    Dec 1, 2007
    Ali Frazier
    Ali Foreman
    Ali Norton
    Holmes Norton
     
  6. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
  7. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    None of the Ali fights work, unless they were before his exile, because that's his prime.

    Marciano Moore I was thinking of, but isn't Moore's prime in the light heavyweight division?

    Louis was actually only 22 years old when he lost to Schmeling. However in his rematch he was 25 years old if im not mistaken. But during the rematch, Schemling was 33 years old. So I don't think I would consider it.

    If Sharkey was 30 years old when he hit his prime, then Schemling vs Sharkey would work. However I don't know if that is the case or not, so someone will have to shed more light on it.

    I dont consider Liston vs Patterson prime vs. prime. Liston was 30 years old in their first bout. And thats not even considering the fact that he was probably actually 33 years old. I say Liston was in his prime around 1958, right when he defeated Whitehurst, and was about to start the onslough of Williams. But this is definitely the closest one yet.


    All of a sudden Foreman vs. Frazier is going up in stock in your guys mind, no? lol
     
  8. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Louis was in his prime against Schmeling the first time around but not at his peak. Same with Schmeling. The second time around Max was past his prime.

    Baer-Schmeling would fit there.
    Sharkey-Schmeling the first time fits the bill perfectly, the second time still somewhat but I won´t argue if somebody says Sharkey was a bit past it.
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Ali was past it against Foreman.
    Norton is not an atg.
     
  10. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,133
    8,588
    Jul 17, 2009
    Ali was still not far off his prime though. As I'm always saying,when in shape and focused Ali was the nearest to his '67 peak as he could get between 1972 - 74.
     
  11. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    I agree with you but there are many who would beg to differ on Norton...especially h2h.
     
  12. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Well norton does NOT rank highly head to head because he's handicapped vs punchers and because he didn't beat anyone that was in their prime. he beat Quarry, Ali, yeah, but these guys were signifficantly faded.


    Well Ali-Frazier works more then Holmes-Cooney because Cooney was not an ATG or legendary.
    Ali still looked damn good, and was shoveling those one two's out very well.


    Foreman-Frazier is still not really a good comparison if you're not going to use the Ali-Frazier comparison. Frazier took batterings in the first Ali fight and the Quarry fight. He was not using his right hand as much as he was using in the Ellis fight or even the first quarry fight.
    Also his weight increased, and he clearly didn't look as conditioned as he was vs Foster, Quarry, or Ali.
     
  13. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Corbett vs Jackson is the standout, imo
    The rest fall just short for various reasons:

    Corbett vs Fitzsimmons
    Johnson vs Jeanette
    Langford vs Wills
    Marciano vs Moore
    Ali vs Liston I
    Liston vs Patterson
    Frazier vs Foreman
    Holyfield vs Bowe
    Walcott vs Charles
    Louis vs Baer
    Braddock vs Baer
    Braddock vs Louis
    Louis vs Schmelling
     
  14. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    come on dude,
    liston was not prime in the Ali fight or the Patterson fight.
     
  15. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Really? I thought he must have been pretty damn close in Patterson I, actually i thought he was prime, the only question mark on that fight qualifying would have been the status of Paterson being legendary.

    Liston was past prime vs Ali, but not that far past prime, being just 6 or so months after his second demolition job on Paterson. It would only just fall short of qualifying.

    Johansen v Paterson I and perhaps two is another i just thought of too, though i dont know if these two are necessarilly qualifying under the legendary qualification.