this is a p4p top 10 base'd on nothing but accomplishment 1.pacman 2.hopkins 3.mosley 4.w.klitscho 5.calderon 6.darchinyan 7.vasquez 8.pavlik 9.cotto 10.williams now before all you jmm nuthuggers start bitching about wheres jmm why isnt he number 2 like all us dopes rate him ask yourself has he acheived more in his career than current active fighter such as b-hop who just destroyed 1 of the 2 best middleweights in the world and mosley who is coming off 2 great wins over mayorga and margarito ? infact has he acheived more then anyone ranked in the top 5 of this list ? NO
How the **** can a P4P top ten based on 'nothing but accomplishment' have Kelly Pavlik in it but not Ricky Hatton?
eh because pavlik is the lineal middleweight champ he beat the man who beat the man atsch who the **** has hatton beat oh yeah an acient tszyu and castillo wow thats ****ing amazing isnt it
Woop di do. Hatton is the lineal light welterweight champion, has won a title at welterweight and beat the top contenders in his division over a sustained period. You say you've done a list based on accomplishments and then you put Pavlik in on the basis of one fight. If you actually did a list based on achievements guys like Pavlik, Cotto, Williams, Darchinyan and Calderon would not be in - these are the people who get into people's regular P4P lists for factors other than just their achievements.
The big error he made was starting the list in the first place. Of course, if you were going to make a top ten list of active fighters based on nothing but accomplishments, the first names on your list would have to be people like Roy Jones, Oscar De La Hoya, Marco Antonio Barerra....
like wat ? beat casamayor and lose to barrera john and pac ? wlad has unified the heavyweight division and dominated this **** for years