Lemieux on GGG's hype "Hes just another fighter. Cotto-Canelo are not middleweights

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mellamomarcos, Aug 20, 2015.


  1. mellamomarcos

    mellamomarcos Active Member Full Member

    1,285
    3
    Mar 10, 2010
    [yt]M9wGB79HQvI[/yt]

    Lemieux is right about cotto and canelo. I would hate to see the cotto/canelo winner fighter the GGG/Lemieux winner at a catchweight. What do you make of Lemieux's chances? Has anyone seen odds on this fight yet?
     
  2. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,898
    8,374
    Jun 22, 2015
    Then Canelo and Cotto don't need to be fighting for Middleweight titles.
    They should fight for those belts Canelo lost to Floyd at 154.
    The catchweight thing is getting stupid. Either move up or vacate. Can the WBC not be as corrupt as the country it comes from?
     
  3. aaalbert

    aaalbert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,041
    2,028
    Jan 15, 2015
    Cheap shot to Mexico. Not cool man...
     
  4. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,898
    8,374
    Jun 22, 2015
    :patsch I apologize. How are they going to have 2 champions on their website for middleweight and a silver champion? Either it's Cotto or Gennady not both. How is Mayweather defending 2 WBC titles in 1 division? It's just getting out of hand. This sport does not respect itself sometimes.
     
  5. aaalbert

    aaalbert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,041
    2,028
    Jan 15, 2015
    It's cool and I agree. The belts now and days are becoming such a joke that any bum can get easily.
    They really should eliminate the catch-weight garbage, make less belts and if you don't find the mandatory, vacate or be stripped..