Lemmux retired at 37 - Wlad still going strong @ 38

Gotta love Brittards and their theoretical wins....
Every thread with Lewis or Haye is filled with "would've" when discussing their idols....too bad their heroes never got in the ring and proved it, instead running off into retirement.

 

I would say Lewis was at 40% in that match. A 100% Lewis finish klitschko in 4

 

purrity knocked him out..so did sanders...so did brewster. when you think about it, wlad is actually nothing more than a bum. he's just lucky to be around in an era where there is zero talent in heavyweight boxing...if those guys could ko him, imagine what would have happened to him if he had to fight guys like tyson, lewis, holyfield, mercer, ruddock, etc, in their primes...even bruno or moorer or foreman...he would have been damn near killed by every one of them.

 

:rofl

Lewis smashed Vitalis face in, if Vitali was so good he would have beat Lewis first time round when he had the perfect chance, but he wasn't good enough. Rahman did it when he came up against an unfit, unmotivated Lewis, but Lewis always did better in rematches and we saw what he did to Rahman when he took it seriously, and that was someone who knocked him out, imagine what he would do when 100% to someone who's face he disfigured and stopped in 6 rounds.

So lets go over that again, Hasim Rahman faced a well below par Lewis and was good enough to win, Vitali wasn't. Let that sink in Klittard, while you imagine sucking Vitalis testicles and proclaiming him some ATG unbeatable machine. Hasim Rahman was able to do something Vitali was not good enough to do, Hasim Rahman!!! I should also mention that Rahman also beat Sanders, something which Wlad was not good enough to do either.

Oh and by the way, why did Vitali run off into retirement instead of fighting Rahman? Wlad also wanted nothing to do with him when he was still relevant.

So I think we can conclude that prime Rahman was much better than Vitali and probably better than Wlad too. Just shows how strong the 90's and early 00's were and how terrible the division has been after that.

 

"Theoretical wins"

This whole thread is based on Vitalis "theoretical win" against Lewis.

In "reality" he lost

 

That's when you know they run out of arguments. "Tyson would...". "Haye would..." "Louis could..."

That's all they have left. Leave them to their fantasy! :rofl:rofl

 

Lewis did.

 

"Vitali would have won, if the referee didnt stop the fight".....

"Vitali would have win a rematch".....

 

Lewis never fought Waldo, the point of the thread. Vitali and Wlad aren't a two headed monster you know. Just cause you beat one doesn't mean that you automatically beat the other.

 

Biggest pay day???

Bigger than the Tyson/Holyfield pay days??

 

You're the idiot who wrote out a novel claiming the Klits lost their dad when they were young... you clueless little **** ya.. hahaha

 

Hold on, Im not asking about the "size" of the fight.

Are you saying that Lewis would get paid more than the purse he made against Tyson??

Any evidence for this?

Or even more than he made against Holyfield?

 

If remove all those Brits out of votes and replace them with the identical number of voting Ukrainians what do you think the end result will look like?

:hey

 

"wlad would have won if he hadn't been koed"