Lennox Lewis (2003) vs. Hasim Rahman (2001)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by The Kurgan, Mar 23, 2011.


  1. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    How would the 256 lb Lennox Lewis in his late 30s do against the Hasim Rahman who knocked him out in South Africa in 2001?
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    Probably beat him by early-mid stoppage...like he would have done 9 times out of 10.
     
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,479
    9,371
    Jul 17, 2009
    Agreed. As long as Lennox comes in fully focussed,there's no way that Rahman beats him.
     
  4. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    I see. But do you think that Lewis was better in 2003 than in 2001?
     
  5. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    No.
     
  6. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    What about the Ray Mercer who fought Lewis in 1996? Would you make him a favourite vs. a 256 lb Lewis in 2003?
     
  7. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    Yes. Ray Mercer fought the best fight he could that night, an overweight Lennox would have done well to push the pace to the point of winning rounds.
     
  8. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,479
    9,371
    Jul 17, 2009
    Yes. Mercer would beat the 2003 incarnation of Lennox.
     
  9. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    129
    Aug 13, 2009
    The Lewis who fought Vitali brought the right strategy to beat Rahman, pressuring out of a tight guard behind his jab, staying close, looking to hold+hit continously, and bombing power shots. He would have put Rahman out eventually, who was even less capable than Vitali when forced to fight at close quarters. Rahman hits harder than Vitali but I'm not sure he would be landing as much as he didn't like to throw punches when his opponent was the aggressor, Lewis would overwhelm him once again.

    It wasn't so much his weight or age, it is how Lewis fights. In the first Rahman fight, he didn't put enough pressure on Rahman and got knocked out while laying back; his punch out put was absurdly low in that one. Like Steward said, he told Lewis to keep throwing punches in the rematch and not let Rahman get comfortable..result was a dominating knockout.
     
  10. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    27
    Oct 25, 2010
    Exactly.
     
  11. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    Lewis fought out of character against Rahman in that first fight, but very much how he does in sparring for his fights. Laying on the ropes very passive. He basically treated Rahman like a second rate sparring partner and he got sparked.

    Once Lewis figured out how to fight, he would have never lost to Mercer again. The best version of Mercer would have still lost to 2003 Lewis. Lewis just became a different fighter back in the Garden that night and never looked back, whereas Mercer never got any better.