Lennox Lewis and Jack Dempsey: Styles, A Twisted Mirror?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jul 18, 2007.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,071
    48,237
    Mar 21, 2007
    I apologise for the title of this thread.

    Lennox Lewis could be described as a slugger with a boxer's style.

    Could Dempsey be described as a boxer with a slugger's style?

    Let's have a quick look -


    Lennox Lewis is often cricised for being reticent, not aggressive enough. He often described himself as a pugilist specialist. Meanwhile, we see he has tremendous power, great strength, excellent defensive infighting skills and supsect stamina and chin - everything a slugger who may need to defend/rest might need. But his safety first mentality resulted in a very different style.

    With Dempsey you have a fighter who is most comfortable up on his toes, quick, with very quick hands. He throws great combo's, has great reactions, times his man, is a natural counterpuncher.

    Of course he can slug too - see the left hook that supposedly shattered Willard's cheek bone in 13 places. But it may be worth remembering that that shot was part of a combo which began with a two handed attack on the body and came after patient stalking.

    Dempsey seemed to think about every punch, made great angles, had excellent stamina and was all round a very intelligent fighter.

    And yet he was a vicious boxer who was set to seek and destroy seemingly from the first bell. Again, perhaps this is about mentality. Dempsey describes feelings of fear, that he may be beaten if he doesn't take his man out early, that he may be killed if he isn't the one doing the killing.

    My question is: Do you think these fighters would have been as - or even more - succesful if they'd swaped styles?
     
    BitPlayerVesti and BCS8 like this.
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,867
    3,118
    Apr 16, 2005
    If guys like McCall and Rahman could take Lewis out, the Manassa Mauler destroys him early.

    Lewis might have a size advantage, but when Dempsey starts throwing leather, Lewis ends up getting beat up just like Willard did. Willard, however, had a better chin. This one ends with Lewis out cold on the canvas.
     
  3. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    Agreed.

    Dempsey did try to change his style for Sharkey, but it didn't work out for him very well. For the most part, that bout went Sharkey's way until the sudden kayo. (I'm not overlooking the fact that Dempsey's prime had already ended early.)

    Interesting question where Lewis is concerned, not one I can offer any sort of informed opinion about.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,071
    48,237
    Mar 21, 2007

    ...well this thread isn't about Dempsey v Lewis.

    But you do know that Lewis fought better fighters than the two you've mentioned and not been knocked out?
     
  5. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,867
    3,118
    Apr 16, 2005
    Ooops.....force of habit, I guess!!:lol::lol:

    Seriously, though, if Dempsey and Lewis switched styles, Lewis would have gotten knocked out MORE often. Were he to have been that aggressive, those shaky whiskers would have gotten badly exposed many times.

    Dempsey just would have been boring - I don't even want to think about it, really.
     
  6. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    I think they were better off with thier styles although this is an interesting thread.

    Dempsey being a swarmer had the luxury unlike Frazier, Tyson or Marciano of opting to box as opposed to fighting aggressively soley on the fact that he had the height to be a boxer. Whereas Tyson, Frazier and Marciano were short guys who had to fight the way they fight to be successful. I think his style was perfect for his time. Ultra aggressive yet it played into his physicalities of speed strength and power.

    Lewis on the other hand was again better off the way he was. Although between the two of them Lewis probably would have been the more sucessful one by swapping styles. Thing about Lewis is his chin has always been put into questions. While I dont believe its China I do believe that a big puncher can end things abruptly with one well placed shot. Would he be sucessful as a slugger yes but only mildly. He'd probably end up in the same tier as Ruddock, Morrison, Mercer group.
     
    BitPlayerVesti likes this.
  7. Ethan Trims

    Ethan Trims Active Member Full Member

    530
    1
    May 6, 2007
    Its interesting you describe dempsey as a counter puncher,

    I know Tyson liked dempsey's style and incorporated it into his. So I would of thought he was a pressure puncher(dempsey was).
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,071
    48,237
    Mar 21, 2007
    Ran a thread last week about Dempsey's head movement - his slip and duck, and it was generally agreed that Dempsey had the best head movement in the divisions history. He made his man miss, he countered of that. Not a classic counter puncher perhaps, but countering from the front foot, certainly.
     
  9. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    Dempsey didn't counter punch so much against opponents who boxed shorter than he did, but in the opening minute against Willard, Jack slips a jab to counterstrike with a picturesque hook. (He looked like a cobra doing that, and had scribes analogize him to one. Very graceful in his movements.) The mid ring right to Tunney's temple, which initiated the Long Count KD sequence, was also a countershot, off of Tunney's slipped jab.
     
  10. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    yawn!
     
  11. Stewbear

    Stewbear Active Member Full Member

    538
    5
    May 5, 2006
    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=u4SQmxIP5Bk

    oh and try acutally reading posts before you respond?
     
  12. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Dempsey could've been fairly succesful if he adopted Lewis' style. Fighting tall at Dempseys size may give a few problems, but allround i think he'd do quite well (though not as good as he did with his actual style).

    The other way around however, i don't think Lewis would be very good with Dempsey's style. I expect him to turn into a Shavers kind of fighter with more technique; the one that either KO's you or loses by KO. Tall fighters are rarely aggressive sluggers, and for good reason.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,071
    48,237
    Mar 21, 2007
    Zak, why do you think Dempsey would have been boring? The most conservatice round he boxed is arguably the 1st v Willard - and we got the most notoriously violent round in boxing history.

    He may not have been quite as exciting overall, perhaps, but he still promises thrills and spills.
     
  14. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    :lol:

    All you have to do is read Lennox Lewis and immediatly go into a tirade about how he was stopped by McCall and Rahman.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,071
    48,237
    Mar 21, 2007
    I agree. But I think if he'd adopted it for Willard and post Willard he wouldn't have lost any fights he won, the Firpo fight may have been easier and he may have posed more problems for Tunney. The basic strategy is much more difficult for example.

    Sure. But Lewis is, in my opinion, the most extraordinary big guy. Look to the Grant fight, for a clue, not that i'm suggesting every opponent would behave like Grant - but Lewis did look like he could punch throught a brick wall.