LENNOX LEWIS: Could he be the greatest heavyweight in history H2H?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Sep 26, 2008.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I agree to an extent, but that still leaves the question open, as Tyson and Lewis were from more or less the same era (10 or so years separated their respective peaks), and Ali fought in the 1970s where the standard was high. Do you think it could be Lewis, or would you favour Tyson or Ali or even Holmes?
     
  2. Kojiro

    Kojiro Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,641
    12
    Nov 11, 2004
    I'm happy to see that the there are more votes for the YES answer. The bias towards the old-timers doesn't cloud the judgment of most ESB'ers.

    While it is tough to say he actually was the best h2h, he very well could be, there's no denying that. A true modern great.
     
  3. Carlos Primera

    Carlos Primera Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,114
    4
    Jan 8, 2007
    it's either tyson or lewis for me.
     
  4. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    Style wise, I think Tyson is a nightmare for him. Obviously Tyson is a notoriously fast starter and Louis was susceptible to being caught early...many staunch Louis supporters insist that the knockdowns he suffered do not signal a weak chin and I'm inclined to agree given how long it took Schmeling to stop him after catching him repeatedly but if Tyson did put him down, it is my belief that he would either be knocked down multiple times in quick succession which of course is hard to come back from even if you are allowed to go on, or he might not beat the count on one of those occasions....Tyson was a ruthless finisher of course.

    As for Lewis, that's a tough question to answer due to the fact that he never encountered a big man with anything like the ability of a Lennox Lewis. I think I might need to rewatch footage of both guys again (it's been a while) and try to come sort of logical conclusion....

    I think you picked out two guys who I think Louis would have utter hell with but for very different reasons. That being said, I still think Louis takes down more other ATG's than Lennox which is why I rank him number 2. Tyson is my favourite all time HW but there are so many question marks against him despite the obviously great prime with the main one being whether he ever had the mental fortitude to compete with the very best, whether he could back if ever behind on points...past his prime these questions were answered in the negative of course.

    What do you think? I detect that you may not rate Joe Louis as highly as many others...
     
  5. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I think Lennox beats Tyson easily to be honest prime vs prime H2H - not as easily as he actually did do when Tyson was a shell and Lennox slightly over the hill.

    I could see Lennox beating Ali - but could also see Ali beating Lennox. Lewis was very methodical and wouldn't chase Ali so much - he was most vulnerable when forced to go looking for someone. I think that guys coming forward were meat and drink - keep them at the end of his long jab, frustrate them, smother their work and unleash the right hand/uppercut to finish them.
     
  6. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006

    Id would pick lewis and holmes over Louis for sure i also think tyson struggles with holyfield when ever they fight
     
  7. LennoxGOAT

    LennoxGOAT Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,234
    4
    Apr 22, 2006
    In H2H, a pre war Ali is the only one where it is a tossup...
     
  8. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    Agree fully with the 1st part of this post, but I am of the view that Ali is a 65-35 favourite over Lewis.

    Lewis could be outjabbed and I'm not sure how he would deal with a 3 dimensional fighter in Ali with all the physical attributes he had namely speed: the guy could fight going backwards, side to side and if need be, coming forward.
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    It's not that I don't rate him very highly, I do rate him highy in a pound-for-pound sense, I have him top 20 OAT definitely, maybe top 15. However, when it comes to h2h I am always trapped in the dilemma of - could a fighter from the 1930s really compete physically with a fighter from the 21st century? I can never decide. I suppose guys with good punch power never go out of fashion, so they would always have a puncher's chance at least. But then when I see footage of guys like Robinson and Pep, their skills cannot be denied. It's the eternal quandary of the boxing enthusiast.

    In general h2h discussions (any weight division), I am inclined to believe the fighters from the 30s,40s,50s etc could take on current fighters on the basis of what I have seen on film. The quality is there.

    In heavyweight h2h discussions, I am inclined to believe that the size, weight and natural strength advantages favour the modern fighters (say from the 1970s onwards).

    Therefore, I can't see Louis coping with Tyson or Lewis.
     
  10. Danny

    Danny Guest

    I think a peak Tyson could very well be the best HW (H2H) in history. I'm a big Tyson fan, & he was truly a sensational fighter back in the day. I find some people, when they discuss Tyson as a fighter, they let their personal opinion cloud their judgement & try to devalue the guys abilities when he was at his peak.

    I would say Tyson would have beaten Holyfield in the early 1990's. For instance, when they were sceduled to meet on Nov.8, 1991, I think Tyson would have won. Holyfield was more inclined to get involved in a scrap back then, rather than be smart & use his technical ability.

    Lewis was nowhere near the fighter in the early 1990's that he would become years later. Lewis was a late developer, some-what green in the early 1990's. Yes, he scored a great win over Razor Ruddock in Oct. 1992, but we have to remember Ruddock was nowhere the fighter he was when he faced Tyson. I think Tyson would have overwhelemed Lewis at that stage.

    Now we come to Bowe, who was a brilliant inside fighter for such a big man. Tyson would have had to have been real sharp to beat Bowe in the early 1990's. A well-trained, disciplined Bowe would have been a match for a HW in history. The key factor would be Tyson 's body attack. He could not neglect that. He would have to break Bowe down.

    I think Tyson & Bowe would have battered each other!
     
  11. Noukstar

    Noukstar Member Full Member

    210
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    Yes, he probably is the H2H champion...

    BUT...

    Frank Bruno troubled him with a jab, for a few rounds. Granted it was a cold, raining night which Lennox was supposedly had the flu for

    but...

    Larry Holmes had an excellent jab...he has got to be up there on Head to heads also, above Tyson even because of his fighting style, longevity and tools at his disposable, like his motor mouth and kicking ability when jumping off cars.
     
  12. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Good point, good avatar.

    I remember the Bruno fight, he gave Lennox REAL trouble for a while, and Holmes had a better jab and was better all-round than Frank.

    The only thing which leads me to believe Lennox could beat Holmes is that peak Lennox (97-00 IMO) was significantly better than the Lennox who fought Bruno.

    Larry v Lennox would be a hell of a fight though!
     
  13. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    Fair enough, it's a dillema for sure and one that I myself have had alot of thought over. It's less of an issue for the lower weights obviously, but it all becomes a bit speculative when it comes to the heavies: the obvious retort for fans of the old time fighters is 'well just think how good they would have been today if they had modern day training methods'.

    It all becomes a bit messy. When talking about this, I think we should just stick to what we know and compare the footage of the fighters.

    For me, the best era's for HW's, and I know many will disagree, were the 70s and the 90s. Louis though, was a phenom and I do see him beating many latter day fighters...but I do understand totally where you are coming from.

    It just gets on my goat a bit when you see people overestimating the size and training factors...I once seen a poster exclaimings that Corrie Sanders (the one who beat Wlad) would have taken down Joe Louis in the early rounds in a similar vein to Wlad :nut
     
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    It could be said that Lennox had the perfect tactics to beat Bruno.......

    Weather the inevitable storm......
    Take a few shots......
    Wait for Bruno to gas......
    End it!

    Bruno was beating Lewis but underestimated the ability of Lewis with his LEFT hand. It seemed everyone knew to watch for the right, but it was probably the first time Lewis won a fight with the lead left hook.

    His jab wasn't as much of a factor at that stage that it would later become under Manny Steward - still often used and excellent, but not the 'go to' punch.
     
  15. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    The only thing Corrie Sanders would have taken down against Joe Louis in the early rounds would be his trunks, trying to tempt Joe into stopping the beating by offering him some tender South African anus!