Lennox lewis giving Peter tips on how to beat vitali

No... it doesn't. That means that Lewis accomplished more than Vitali as a boxer. Vitali's career was cut short by horrible injuries. It doesn't make him vastly superior. Besides that... Lewis did NOT dominate the division for a long period of time. Go check your info. Lewis wasn't considered a true Champion until after he beat Holyfield (who was clearly over the hill by that point). Lewis didn't have his first title defense as true Champion until the year 2000. And it was against Michael Grant. Then he beat Botha, and Tua... then was knocked out by Rahman in 2001. Was that the long domination that you were talking about? Or was it after he beat Rahman to win back his title.... and went on to beat a shell of Mike Tyson and escape against Vitali by winning on a cut in a fight that he was losing... then retiring? Which long domination where you referring to?:huh

 

If he loses to an injury prone guy that has been on a 4 year layoff will you admit he sucks?

Because if he does that is exactly what Peter is.

 

No, I would say Vitali is and always will be the better fighter between the two. Vitali is a tough oppenent, and might still have some fight left in him, though I perdict Peter will get Vitali out of there by the 6th round, he will just be too much for Vitali to handle at his age IMO.

 

Between the two of who? Vitali and Peter? Because Wlad already dominated Sam Peter.

 

I don't care how banged up Vitali is if it took Peter 6 rounds to get rid of Glass Jaw Oleg he won't be getting rid of Klitschko in 6.

It was pathetic it took Peter 6 to get rid of an old, slow, injured Oleg.

 

What was his tip? **** his face up?

 

Lennox also beat old man, name holyfield...

 

I agree brother !

 

we will see...:smoke

 

Vitali will come trained and well prepared. He's very intelligent and very focussed and has a lot of discipline. You won't see a boxer Vitali who is in bad shape - that won't happen.

 

If Vitali beats Peter I will admit Vitali is and always will be the better fighter out of the two, two meaning Peter and Vitali. Wlad didnt dominate Peter he won by 3 points on all three of judges scorecards, was floored 3 times and clinched a total of 97 times, there's actually a well made video up on youtube making fun of Wlad and his scared ways that night. I think you and Rico might and enjoy it, I will try and post it if I could find it again.:yep

 

And?

Please don't tell me you are trying to compare Sam Peter to Lewis :nut

 

No need. I have actually seen the fight plenty of times. Every time that I see the fight, I see Wlad dominate 10 of the 12 rounds that they fought. I also see two bogus knockdowns scored in the 5th round of the fight. Either way... Wlad still dominated 10 of 12 rounds. That is a domination.

 

It just shows how bad a fighter Peter is there is NO EXCUSE to lose a fight when you knock someone down 3 times that is a 6 point swing on the scorecards. It just shows Peter has ZERO Boxing skill. None.

 

Dude i think you should listen to your own advice, Peters beat an over the hill fat ass in james toney and toney was hanging in there with him, thats sad. Peters will get sadly steam rolled by vitali unless vitali pulls a hamstring getting in the ring