Lennox Lewis, Greatest Heavyweight of all time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by barneyrub, Mar 3, 2014.


  1. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    -I meant after Tyson, sorry. I know Tyson/Lewis was big and just posted it as #2 in that other thread for biggest fights of 2000s.

    -Two completely different situations of course. I got baited into that one.
     
  2. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Well, you have your definition but I think it must be noted that in the end this fight not happening was Lewis' decision and I've done enough to make that case. There is no other party to place the blame on. Lewis refused his contender. Rather you think he was right or wrong is going to be a personal decision. I think he was wrong.

    I'm not going to take the Champion at his word. Like Byrd said, if he's so weak, take the 10 million payday and prove it.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,476
    83,300
    Nov 30, 2006
    No, I just think it's funny watching you go blue in the face attempting to convince everyone (but convincing no one) that Byrd was a viable threat or in-demand challenger for Lewis.


    Not just this particular thread, but like - any time Lewis is brought up. :lol:
     
  4. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    That's not the thread I've seen at all.

    I've had good discussion with Magoo and McGrain and provoked some interesting comments. Some agree with me on some points, and some have respectfully not. That is fine.

    Redman and Foxy01 are the only people going blue in the face and making fools of themselves because I dare criticize Lewis. Maybe you should reserve the smugness for their creepy posts and bizarre overreactions.
     
  5. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Well the second point is fair although it was an official eliminator for the ibf. As to the first although Lewis wasn't particularly popular he did have the cachet of being heavyweight champion of the world which was enough to get him a part in oceans 11 and a share in one of the biggest fights iof the century. Byrd had guys threatening to quit there jobs as boxing reporters. He had a small window and he was unable to press the issue.
     
  6. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    -And Lewis was the IBF Champion.

    -I can't agree there. I think Byrd pushed the issue as far as he could. Lewis simply did not want this fight to happen. Byrd beat Holyfield and held the belt for three or four years, tried his best to make the big fights and often failed.

    -ESPN had Byrd's back at this time but your right, his pecking style was not liked in general. Still I think the Tua, McCline, and Golota fights are good fun. He did what he had to do against Holyfield. The Williamson and Oquendo fights generated the nastiest press.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,248
    Feb 15, 2006
    OK

    If Lewis had announced his retirement after his hand was raised in the Tyson fight, the talk would actually have been whether Tyson or Holyfield was going to replace him.

    Byrd was absolutely being talked about as a challenger for Lewis, and there were those accusing him of ducking Byrd.

    Roy Jones was also discussed as a possible challenger, and Lewis was interested in this fight.

    The Klitschko’s didn’t seem to get much mass media attention at all.
     
  8. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    That's all true. Especially the first part, we really weren't ready to give up on Tyson and Holyfield.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,091
    Mar 21, 2007
    There IS no blame. Lewis isn't compelled to fight his #2 contender. I'm sure Tippy Larkin was keen on fighting Sugar Ray Robinson but people don't **** around on the forum trying to uncover some duck.

    If we start shellacking fighters for ducking #2 - #3? - contenders, nobody can be spared. It's a god-damn blood-bath.

    #2 contender is just that. Byrd-Lewis would have been nice. Might have been tricky. Hell, Byrd might have won.

    And Larkin might have beat Robinson.
     
  10. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    These old school analogies really don't work, there was only one Champion then.

    Say in 1949. It would be like if Mills had two LWH belts. And say RING#1 Maxim was busy fighting cans in Germany and RING #2 Moore became his #1 contender to one of thoes belts and he was like "f**K that! I'm dropping that belt, I'm the real Champion, that belt means nothing, I got another."
     
  11. FutureChampGG

    FutureChampGG Member Full Member

    408
    0
    Jul 31, 2010
    Not been funny but this is / was a thread about where Lewis rates amongst the all time best heavyweights.

    You've derailed it with a bizarre multiple page discussion about whether or not he ducked Chris Byrd of all people.

    Are you related to Byrd or something? I've never seen someone debate such a non issue so hard.

    A fight between Lewis and Byrd was never clamored for at the time and it's not like Byrd went on to achieve such great things afterwards which make the Lewis / Byrd match up really interesting in hindsight.

    Now everyone is obviously entitled to their opionion but I don't see how Lewis ducking Byrd, if you want to believe that, impacts on Lewis' greatness ranking at all, it certainly doesn't impact enough to warrant discussion about it dominating this thread.

    There are plenty of legitimate weaknesses to Lewis' resume / career that are worthy of discussion in a thread about where he ranks in the heavyweight pantheon but him not fighting Chris Byrd isn't one of them.
     
  12. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    I disagree.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,091
    Mar 21, 2007
    For me, there was only one champion in 2003, too. And of course technically there were two belts in Robinson's era.

    But I don't buy this #2 contender thing for now. I don't hold fighters "accountable" for failing to fight their number two as judged by the rankngs organisation I work for. Nobody does, to my knowledge.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,091
    Mar 21, 2007
    TO be fair, this is much more interesting (if a bit mad).
     
  15. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    -Nor should you. But when #1 is not available and said #2 contender is worthy, ready, available for a 10 million payday, and has done everything he can to secure the fight only to be outright dismissed with no alternative opponent or valid reasoning beyond not wanting to fight him, it raises a red flag.

    -And as janitor pointed out, there were ducking accusations. I've even linked articles discussing it on such terms.