Love some of the blinkered crap from their so called experts, guys how say "Who has Calzaghe beaten? Kessler, Lacy and Manfredo". Why mention Manfredo as one of his top three wins, when he has Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Mitchell on his resume?
That website is really good. I have them on my myspace and they will send you bulletins. They have all sorts of interviews with fighters/managers/trainers. They get Floyd Senior on there alot which is always a great laugh.
I agree with Lennox. That was a strong and confident Bhop in the ring with Tarver. Not to mention Tarver throws all straight punches and not the easiest guy to avoid and dominate in whatever condition. He landed nothing.
Lennox was a thinking type fighter. He knows how to dissect styles, and he knows Bernard is made to make Calzaghe look like a Sloppy Joe in there.
Wouldn't be the first time Lewis has got a fight pick wrong... ...or the first time he got one right, either. We'll find out soon enough!
All Lennox and co. are doing when they're doing this is justifying why Joe took that fight in the first place. For people who'd never followed Calzaghe's career until Lacy, the wins over those guys and Sheika (much better win than Manfredo IMO) are easily forgotten. Even though Manfredo's not even the 10th best fighter on his resume, making that fight succeeded 100% in what it was set out to do: to help make Joe a better name for US fighters and keep him busy while Calzaghe's camp worked out a big fight, which happened to be Kessler. No excuse for Lennox not to know Joe's resume a little better than that, though.
