Lennox Lewis v Rocky Marciano

Who's the best poster on here, Matt?

 

Rather a bold statement for a Tuesday isn’t it? One I might say that is entirely absent of any proof whatsoever.

Am I wrong to suggest Lewis should be favoured here? Or am I wrong in supporting the point that perry made that Rocky did hit like a hammer?

specific to this thread, I would like you to explain what is so wrong that I have said here today on this thread?

 

Oh but there is, he's the master of illogic and king of the Quorans. He has a chin of iron and once went the distance with jawbreaker knife man whilst suffering a knife wound and a broken jaw.

They call him Ant. Mark Ant.

 

As I recall Both of these examples were your bad interpretations of my points rather than anything I said specifically, which I corrected and explained at the time.

I have no recollection of ever saying “1.3 feet reach advantage is really a disadvantage”. That’s just something you say in disagreement. Just as the other one is not something I directly said..

You certainly convinced yourself without checking with me.

I didn’t ask you to. I said what was I wrong about today after you said I am “consistently wrong”. And you won’t because you can’t say I was wrong about anything. You just disagree. And that’s fine. I have done nothing and said nothing today that deserved anything like what you said of me today on this thread. I am not unwell, but thanks for that.

And I am entitled to answer such a slur as fairly and reasonably as I did. Pity the favour was not returned.

 

Despite the fact that Marciano would get wasted by about any post-Patterson champ of note, not outslicked or outpointed, but w a s t e d, made to appear as tho he were in the wrong sport (or at least wrong division)... despite this, we have people picking against what is arguably the hardest head to head match-up in the division's history.

I've had more logical conversations with FlatEarthers.

 

Just half?

 

I don’t want to debate it. It is your opinion. I can refute it Because it was uncalled for. I had not done or said anything wrong toward you today to deserve that kind of slur. I am not clearly unwell. Your attack is based on nothing I said today. Or on anything you can prove. You picked on me because I quoted one of Perry’s old posts. What’s wrong with that?

 

No tantrum on my part. And I am not twisting anything. You did say I was clearly unwell and that you think lowly of me. I can refute it because there is no call for that kind of thing.

 

I see him as ESB's Karl Pilkington.