Lennox Lewis when he was 'on'..

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Brixton Bomber, Mar 11, 2015.


  1. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Hoo fvcking ray.

    At last, though I suspect you are too dim to see the irony of what you wrote.
     
  2. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    That is more or less verbatim per my original post, in reply to the pedant Magoo. He then got his panties twisted and initiated this whole debacle with his insistence that Rudduck was the aggressor, and Lewis was indeed merely the defensive fighter, in the fight.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    402,605
    84,509
    Nov 30, 2006
    Wait, so more than one pair of people are debating the definition of aggressor in here? :lol:
     
  4. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    grab a chair, a beer, and some popcorn, cause it just started.
     
  5. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    That doesn't sound like no "seek and destroy" I ever heard of. Ruddock is following him around, swinging wildly, taking stupid risks, and not showing an ounce of respect for a murderous puncher in Lewis and it cost him big time. Lewis didn't flip a switch and come out "seek and destroy", even than he was too smart a fighter for that.
     
  6. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    No he isn't. Lewis is holding the centre of the ring for most of the round. He isn't going anywhere for Rudduck to have to follow him.

    He is not the defensive fighter in the fight.

    And he is not fighting off the back foot.