Lennox or Tyson - who hit harder

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PowerPuncher, Oct 7, 2007.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Lets compare Tyson-Lewis on common opponents:

    Rudduck: Lewis KOs in 2 started from 1punch in round 1 that put Rudduck out the fight. Tyson took 7 for a TKO and the full distance

    Golota - Lennox had him out in 1, he quit after 2 rounds with Tyson but wasn't OUT

    Bruno - Lennox couldn't get his power shots off in the fight until R7 when 1 punch turned the tide and he had Bruno out on his feet from 1shot - a barrage had the ref jumping in. Tyson in the first Bruno fight hit Bruno with over 100power shots and Bruno was hurt but he took the shots quite well. The 3rd fight Bruno was scared to death

    Tucker - went the distance with both. Lennox put him down twice

    Holyfield - not sure who hurt him most (Tyson did well early) but Lennox could back him up.

    Botha - both starched him in 1

    Biggs - went 7 with Tyson and 3 with Lewis
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Its hard to say who hit harder between Tyson and Lewis. Both had amazing power.
     
  3. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    I think Lewis hit harder in terms of throwing a single punch, but I Tyson did just as much or more damage with the combos he threw. Tyson generated much of his power from the speed in which he threw the punches, where Lewis used leverage more. Both used the best of the assets they had available.
     
  4. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    Lennox overhand right was bigger than any single tyson punch, but tyson in his prime could throw 3 or 4 power shots so he was a better puncher but didn't punch harder.
     
  5. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    11,347
    17,102
    Jul 2, 2006
    Both were brutal hitters, however Tyson faced a young prime Tucker, and therfore had more trouble with him. Tyson hurt Holyfield more in my opinion but Lewis outboxed him. I'd say Lewis had the slightly better right hand, however Tyson was the more "complete puncher", ie he had speed, better combinations. If i had to do a list of 10 hardest hitting heavyweights, both Lewis and Tyson would make it but if i had to do a list of the 20 most complete punchers regardless of division, then Tyson would still make it and Lewis won't
     
  6. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    I think lewis would make the complete puncher's as he had a better arsenal of punch's than most heavyweights, he might not have been as good at combo's but he had alot of variety.
     
  7. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    11,347
    17,102
    Jul 2, 2006
    Lewis did have a good asernal, and he had good handspeed for a big man but overall he wasn't as complete a puncher as say Robinson, or as accurate as Arguello. Again nothing wrong with him being in the top 20 list
     
  8. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    I just thought that for a guy of lennox's size to have such an arsenal of punch's and such good handspeed was pretty special. In turn he could throw a pretty decnt combo just not on the level of a peak tyson.
     
  9. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    11,347
    17,102
    Jul 2, 2006
    that is true :good
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,959
    48,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    Lewis is in the class above in my view.

    Tyson's composite punching was better though, peak for peak.
     
  11. NickHudson

    NickHudson Active Member Full Member

    894
    21
    Apr 13, 2007
    McGrain,

    are you saying you believe Lewis's most powerful punches to have been a class above Tyson's?

    If so, can you give me a few examples to support this viewpoint. I think they were in the ball park, with Tyson's punches being slightly more devastating because they were quicker, while Lewis was a little more heavy handed.

    Tyson split Golota's skull open (!), and annihilated Botha with a single punch, both accomplishments post prime.

     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,959
    48,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    We agree entirely.
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Both are very hard punchers and have their share of one-punch KO's. If there was an option "equal" i would have voted that. At their level, there is little to distinguish between when it comes to power. Because there was no "equal" option i voted for Lewis because he finished some common opponents (namely Ruddock) off faster, but other circumstances had something to do with that as well.
     
  14. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    Lewis punch;'s on ruddock and rahman are easily as good as the tyson punc's anyone has mentioned.
     
  15. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    56
    Jul 20, 2004
    Actually, Tyson put Botha out cold with one shot, while Lewis put him down with a four-punch combination, from which he got up, but the referee stopped it. All-in-all, Lewis has a 4-2-1 edge here, but it is worth noting that most of these men had aged and gone downhill since their fights with Tyson by the time they got to Lewis.

    Personally, I think they're pretty close, maybe with an edge to Tyson at his absolute peak.