Lennox or Tyson - who hit harder

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PowerPuncher, Oct 7, 2007.


  1. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,866
    3,117
    Apr 16, 2005
    Tyson, no question. He destroyed guys in his prime. And, like others have said, Lewis beat many of these guys after Tyson had already damaged them.
     
  2. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    I give the edge to Tyson

    Lewis may have been more heavy handed but Tyson was heavy handed himself. Not to mention that he had better leverage when he threw punches, speed and technique that made his shots so explosive. They are in the same Tier but Tyson's punches I imagine were a little sharper so he gets the nod.

    You have to remember that he stopped some pretty durable guys during his hey day.

    Pinklon Thomas
    Larry Holmes

    Durable guys never stopped before or after they met Tyson.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,178
    25,428
    Jan 3, 2007
    And not to mention, Lewis was Ko'd early by two mediocre fighters.

    Sorry, just thought I'd save you the trouble by getting that one off. :lol:
     
  4. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Thomas was stopped in his next fight by Holyfield, but fair point. Holyfield couldn't floor Thomas despite landing tons of combinations during the entire fight.
     
  5. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    I don't understand why half the people say tyson, he was a better combination puncher but i don't see how his one shot power is better than lewis. Tyson could throw 3 or 4 very powerful shots but i don't see them individually being as hard as a big overhand right from lewis.
     
  6. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
  7. Luigi1985

    Luigi1985 Cane Corso Full Member

    4,632
    30
    Feb 23, 2006

    Ditto!
     
  8. Icemmann

    Icemmann Breakin it down. Full Member

    954
    15
    Oct 10, 2006
    With the right hand I'd say lennox, but not by much. With the Left I'd go with Tyson.
     
  9. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    Neither could Morrison or Bowe
     
  10. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,866
    3,117
    Apr 16, 2005
    Thanks for the assist!! :hey:good
     
  11. RoccoMarciano

    RoccoMarciano Blockbuster Full Member

    2,892
    16
    Jan 15, 2007
    You two guys have great analyses, but what in the heck does that have to do with how hard Lennox could hit in reality?
     
  12. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    A spot on analysis. I agree entirely, they're both in the same bracket overall. :good
     
  13. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    In my opinion tyson was a harder one shot puncher whilst not in his prime, however he could thorw 3-4 shots of slightly less power in his prime making him more effective.
     
  14. Danny

    Danny Guest


    Whilst I agree Lewis' overhand right was a devestating shot, I don't know if it was more powerful than Tyson's uppercut. Hard one to call anyway!

    Has there ever been a HW with a better uppercut than a peak Tyson? I don't think there has been!
     
  15. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,866
    3,117
    Apr 16, 2005
    Nothing. It's kind of an inside joke.

    Regardless, I would argue the record shows Tyson hit harder. If you look at his peak years, he blew through guys, destroyed them, in a way that Lewis did with far less frequency. And, as others have mentioned - many of Lewis' KO victims were guys Tyson had already starched.