Lenox prob. damn happy didnt rematch

It's funny how the Vitlay nuthuggers slaughter Lewis for refusing to give a challenger he beat by stoppage a rematch..... yet don't say anything when their man continually fights old man and never were's.

Oldest, fattest, shottest Lewis TKO 6 Prime Vitali Klitschko.

That's the bottom line.

And it's getting kinda old.

 

the amount of Vitali dick riding that is being displayed in this thread while completely ****ing mind boggling is an amazing site. How could this many posters lose their ****ing minds over Vitali beating an old fat Briggs, and then try to compare this to when Lewis stopped a Young Prime Briggs is astounding. And then the insinuation that Vitali would have beaten Lewis in the rematch because of this fight is also Hilarious, I didn't hear you guys say this crap when Vitali was sloshing away against Albert "Padded Record" Sosnowski

 

Oh and by the way. There's a saying you're only as good as your last fight.

Did Lennox Lewis look shot in his career-best win over Tyson to you?

 

You are telling me to watch???

Lewis was flabby, slow and lumbering, anyone could see that. Vitali couldn't stop the Champ, the Champ pulled through and slaughtered Vitali's eye into a mess. It was horrific.

 

atsch
Where do these fools come from, and WHY do they spend their time on a BOXING site? :huh

 

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

 

To be fair, Briggs is black and has dreadlocks.

So this is kind of like beating Lewis.

 

spot on :good

 

More than the reported $20 million he got against Tyson?

 

LMAO how can you even use the term stupidity after making such an absurd post?

in boxing, the true 'age' of a fighter, is distinguished by how many years he has been fighting at top level, if a guy has had a long ass career, spanning 15/20 years, he may end up being around 39 years old, but be totally over the hill....

in contrast, another 39 year old fighter, whose pro career may have only spanned up to ten years or so, would be a fresh, 'young' 39/40 year old fighter......

and the history of boxing reflects this mother****er

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

Yeah....Lewis destroyed a much better Briggs and scrapped Vitaly face too.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6xldahJECQ[/ame]

 

What you say is true, so I wonder how can one's logic fail so much. Tell me EverLast, exactly how many years Briggs spent fighting at the TOP of the divison, and how many Vitali did? I'll help you: Shannon had exactly 4 (four) HW world title fights and 5 (five) others scheduled for championship rounds. That's 9 (nine) 12 rounders in a 18 year career. Vitali had 13 (thirteen) world title fights and another 12 (twelve) scheduled for championship rounds. That's 25 (twenty-five) 12 rounders in a 12 year career.

Now tell me, if "in boxing, the true 'age' of a fighter, is distinguished by how many years he has been fighting at top level", how come Shannon is so shot, and almost 40yo Vitali is not?

 

Remember, VITLAY got a 4 year break after Rahman chased him out of boxing.

Judging by the beatbowns Briggs' took by facing and getting battered by the hardest hitters of all time, he is closer to 1400 than 420 years old.

Remember when 8000 year old Foreman took him to school? :rofl

 

I actually wonder whether you're joking or not but since it's a Klitschko thread I shan't give you the benefit of the doubt.
Lewis looked like he'd slipped a bit not shot but aging and if you consider beating up a shot fighter fifteen years removed from his prime Lewis' career best win then you need psychiatric help.

 

Good point. you got to it first!:good