Leon Spinks, Jim Braddock & Tyson Fury - rank the worst lineal HW champs in order.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Nov 29, 2015.


  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,067
    82,887
    Nov 30, 2006
    Make the case for your ordering.

    I've left off some of the other names that sometimes pop up in the "worst lineal HW champion of all time" discussion, because frankly I think enough consensus exists among serious boxing people that guys Rahman, Douglas & Briggs - while a wintry climb of Mt. Everest removed from the echelon of Louis, Ali, Holmes, Lewis, Johnson, Dempsey, Marciano, etc. - still clearly stand above the aforementioned three, by whatever metric you like, be it virtue of deed or head2head capability. Some may disagree, but I'm not going to fret over the lunatic fringe. You can please some of the people sometimes...

    BONUS POINTS - make the case in earnest from all three sides, at least for which is best of the maligned trio, playing devil's advocate, if you can manage, twice over against whichever opinion you happen to hold. :hey ie, you feel it goes 1) Fury 2) Spinks 3) Braddock - so make the opposing case for Spinks or Braddock as #1 to prove your objectivity and broadness of perspective in seeing every conceivable angle in the argument before reaching your conclusion.
     
  2. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,463
    Jan 10, 2007
    Okay :)

    I won't take late 1800's - early 1900's (Sullivan, Corbett, Fitzimmons, Burns rtc) because there's lack of video. We can't judge them.

    Since Jack Johnson my H2H list of HW champions would look like. From worst to best

    1.Leon Spinks
    2.James Braddock
    3.Shannon Briggs
    4-6.Hasim Rahman or Tyson Fury or Carnera

    Douglas was better than all of the above for sure.
     
  3. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    786
    Aug 17, 2015
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,067
    82,887
    Nov 30, 2006
    Fury over Briggs, eh?

    Granted, the Foreman decision was terrible. George beat Shannon. That said, he did get there by stopping Valdes. What did Fury actually do except talk his way into a shot at the lineal title?
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,560
    27,187
    Feb 15, 2006
    The #1 spot undoubtedly belongs to Leon Spinks. For all of the other contenders, you can point to some sort of high quality win, outside of the inevitable title winning performance. Spinks really doesn’t have anything else. Sorry Leon!

    Fury theoretically holds the #2 spot, based on his current credentials, but he is bound to get some other decent wins, so I withhold him from the list for now.

    Douglas, Briggs, and Ramhan are what I call “two hit wonders”. They won the lineal title, but they also managed one other significant career defining win. I get the idea that Fury might just turn out to be a two hit wonder. I would be minded to put Briggs in the #2 spot.

    Braddock for his spotty record is a three or four hit wonder. Amidst his myriad of losses he got quality wins occasionally.

    Carnera does not belong in the company.

    Given the three fighters you have limited me to, I would have to say:
    1. Spinks
    2. Fury (for now)
    3. Braddock
     
  6. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,463
    Jan 10, 2007
    I don't rate Briggs because of his very weak resume.

    He looks good on tape, hard hitter, fast, athletic etc.

    But his resume was pretty bad:

    48 y.o. Foreman (robbery), 44 y.o. Mercer and come-from-behind last second KO win over Lyakhovic are easily his 3 best wins.

    His losses aren't good, too.

    Tua's KO1 victim Wilson KO'd him in 3, Botha beat him but was robbed, McCline easily beat him and even Cedrick Fields got a W against Briggs.

    Yes, I know, Fury got a gift against John F*cking McDermott, who is worse than any of the mentioned above, but it was years ago, and he improved since that fight.
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,067
    82,887
    Nov 30, 2006
    :good Well dissected.
     
  8. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    Who is Valdes and how to was he any good?
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,067
    82,887
    Nov 30, 2006
    Well he beat Nate Tubbs.

    Compare with Fury's best win before his shot - Cunningham. At heavyweight Cunningham beat Mansour, Visinia, Gavern. Reckon any of those are better than Nate Tubbs?
     
  10. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    Cunningham was a cruiser champ. Chisora beat Helenius. And Mansour was at about the same level as Tubbs.
     
  11. Boxing125

    Boxing125 Active Member Full Member

    503
    21
    Jul 5, 2015
    So you have Tyson Fury as one of the worst 3 lineal HW champs when he has never lost a professional fight and just beat someone who has been champion for 9 years?

    At least give Fury a chance to see how long his reign lasts before coming to such a definitive conclusion - I seem to remember in the late 70s some people ( including boxing journalists) saying that Larry Holmes was one of the worst HW champions of all time - obviously Fury is no Holmes but the point stands.

    For the record I think Fury is already above Braddock - he just beat Wlad who many have as a top 10 ATG
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,560
    27,187
    Feb 15, 2006
    It is obviously a premature conclusion. If he retired tomorrow, then perhaps. Muhammad Ali wouldn’t look all that great, if he retired after beating Liston. With the other candidates, we are dealing with complete careers.
     
  13. Mr Icaman

    Mr Icaman 32-0 WBC Champ, Ring + Lineal HW Champ Full Member

    4,451
    3,429
    Aug 31, 2015
    But he doesn't like Fury so he needs to make up something like this for him to feel better..
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,118
    21,653
    Sep 15, 2009
    To be totally honest I don't see Fury as in this group at all.

    He was an undefeated prospect and the reigning British, Commonwealth and European champion. He won the fight clearly against the man who was clearly the best.

    I don't see this as a fluke, I expect him to rack up about 5 defences or so which will be totally decent.

    Spinks beat a fading Ali but never did anything else.

    Braddock beat a prime but injured Baer and was arguably the best LHW in the world as well.

    Fury is an unknown so we will have to see how his career plays out.
     
  15. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,262
    Sep 5, 2011
    I don't see Fury in this group either.

    He has, after all, been a consistent winner, and is still undefeated.

    Braddock was 14-20-1 with 2 NC in the 37 fights leading into the Baer fight, even with his 1934 & 1935 push.

    Spinks hadn't beaten anyone of note and had a draw with LeDoux, the best he had fought.

    Fury might turn out to be one of the worst, but we should at least give the guy a chance to earn such a low rating with bad performances.