Leonard-Hearns II

I

I agree. I think Hearns won but not the robbery people make it out to be

 

What you're saying makes no sense of course it's a robbery if there's no mathematical way for Leonard to earn a draw it's a robbery end of unless you're just giving rounds to Leonard for the sake of it. Fights don't have to be wide decisions for it to be considered a robbery, pretty much anyone who has ever watched the fight has Hearns clearly winning by atleast 2 or 4 points i've never seen a single scorecard for Leonard so it's a clear robbery.

The OP is only one i've ever seen score it for Leonard and to be quite blunt his scorecard is atrocious and not to be taken seriously 9-3 for Leonard is a joke. As i said before in this thread i'm all for different opinon/takes on scoring fights, but there's no defending a 9-3 scorecard for Leonard either you have bad eye sight or are a fan boy of SRL because there's no logical explanation how you could come up with 9-3 score for Leonard.

Even Leonard himself admits he lost the fight that in itself should say it all.

 

I agree having Leonard winning 9 of 12 rounds is a joke. I never said I scored it 9-3 for SRL. I scored it 6-5 for Hearns with one round being even. I just don't think by me having Hearns winning by one point is a robbery. I'll watch the fight again today

 

The fight is competitive but its a clear win for Hearns you'd have to be reaching to give Leonard a draw let alone winning the fight.

When pretty much 98 percent of fans believe Hearns won the fight and you have Leonard himself admitting it then I think that's a clear robbery.

Like I said you don't have to dominate a fight for it to be considered a robbery Hearns still clearly won close but clear hence its a robbery in my book.

 

Ray didn't have Angie in his corner.

 

Last time I watched it, the 2 KDs were the difference on the cards for me. 114-112 for Tommy