Leonard or Robinson - Who had faster hands?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sweet Science, Oct 9, 2007.


  1. Sweet Science

    Sweet Science Peaceful Muslim Warrior Full Member

    1,116
    8
    Jun 20, 2007
    I would say Leonard had slightly better hand speed.
     
  2. DavidPayne

    DavidPayne ***.boxingwriter.co.uk Full Member

    524
    0
    Oct 5, 2007
    Instinctively I'd opt for Ray Leonard, but of course, he lacked Robinson's knockout power.

    I'm not sure there is much in it, Robinson changed so much about the boundaries of how fighters could operate. Though true informed historians will doubtless point to the fighters that influence and shaped Robinson's game as the real innovators.

    Sugar Ray Robinson was tremendously quick.
     
  3. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Leonard, marginally. :thumbsup
     
  4. Lefty Supremacy

    Lefty Supremacy Member Full Member

    192
    2
    Mar 19, 2007
    For pure handspeed I'll go with Leonard. Robby had insane accuracy to go with his handspeed though.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,773
    44,355
    Apr 27, 2005
    I'd think Leonard by a smidgeon, but i'd like to see John Garfield's comments. He's the man for this one.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Leonard was quicker but didn't put as much on his shots. If you put more on your shots they arent as quick.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,773
    44,355
    Apr 27, 2005
    I'm assuming you (and everyone else who states Leonard as matter a factly) have seen footage of SRR at 147 where he was likely at his fastest due to obvious weight, age and peak quotient reasons? If not you've seen him live?

    Anybody going by footage of SRR at Middleweight only isn't really in position to comment here IMO. Certainly not in the way you have. I am in the same boat of course. For a true answer here we need to compare the two at 147.

    John Garfield might be the voice of reason on this one.
     
  8. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Personal memories from 50 years ago are not the way to go mate.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,773
    44,355
    Apr 27, 2005
    Better than no memories or footage at all, especially given that John is honest, sincere and not prone to go over the top with either era. He's not a days of yore man whatsoever.
     
  10. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004
    For pure blurring speed, I'd give the edge to Leonard, but most were shoeshines to get out of trouble or catch the judges eyes. Every shot in an SRR combo was meant to flatten.
     
  11. DaveTheWave

    DaveTheWave Man Extraordinaire Full Member

    436
    10
    Jul 9, 2007
    Consider weight; sure, Robinson was a middle for the footage we've seen, but as an example he was 154 or 155 in the ring the night of the last LaMotta fight. That's about what most welters weigh in the ring on the night of the fight anyway. Robinson didn't weigh in at 160 for that one. Also, Leonard slightly faster, but not enough to make much of a difference.
     
  12. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    I think Leonard had slightly faster hands.:good
     
  13. Blacc Jesus

    Blacc Jesus . Full Member

    1,495
    23
    Aug 30, 2007
  14. pryorgatti

    pryorgatti Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    2
    Nov 1, 2004
  15. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    Finally a vote for Robinson.