Leonard or Robinson - Who had faster hands?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sweet Science, Oct 9, 2007.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,280
    45,421
    Apr 27, 2005
    Thanks John, i was guessing similar.
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,280
    45,421
    Apr 27, 2005
    Didn't they come in at the chosen weight basically back in SRR's day? I thought weigh in times etc were different.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,280
    45,421
    Apr 27, 2005
    No way in the world.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,280
    45,421
    Apr 27, 2005
    :good

    Emmanuel often commented how overlooked Hearns speed was and said it was pivotal vs Duran not to mention Leonard.
     
  5. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,973
    2,419
    Jul 11, 2005
    Amateur Leonard had argueably the 2nd or 3rd fastest hands I've seen (behind Meldrick and argueably behind Jones). The footage of Robinson as an amateur or at welter (not much is available, but there's still some footage to estimate his handspeed) wasn't as impressive.
     
  6. SugarRay

    SugarRay Active Member Full Member

    688
    3
    Mar 18, 2006
    Leonard's appear to be quicker but, it could be the due to advances in cameras, which could record movement more accurately. However, Robinson's was more accurate, which had more devastating effects.
     
  7. werety

    werety Active Member Full Member

    815
    11
    Apr 30, 2007
    I kinda agree with stonehands upon watching leonard hearns again. In this fight leonard is forced to throw his hardest punches and none of his fancy flurries. He still looks extremely fast, but hearns looks just as fast to me, if not faster. Hard to put robinson in the mix with lack of film though.
     
  8. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    313
    Dec 12, 2005
    Robinson is tough. Film quality is not as colorful, literally and the camera was set at a distance. Compare Tyson's film to Louis's... Tyson has the advantage of a microphone in the ring, close-up angles and bristling color. Poor Louis is grainy, gray, and with fake sound effects.
     
  9. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Yes way in the world. De La Hoya's handspeed at times compares to Leonard's, and Mosley's early welterweight days maybe even quicker.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,280
    45,421
    Apr 27, 2005
    We're seeing two totally different things, but each to their own i guess.
     
  11. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Howard Davis Jr. and Bernard Taylor was faster than either De La Hoya or Mosley, and I'm apt to say that Camacho was also.
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,430
    25,915
    Jan 3, 2007
    Although his prime was very short, I seem to remember Meldrick Taylor having very quick hands in his early days. The Courtney Hooper and Chavez fights come to mind.
     
  13. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Leonard was a bit faster and Robinson a bit more powerful. It evens out when thinking of speed to power ratio.
     
  14. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,879
    11,851
    Jan 6, 2007
    Leonard, if it matters.
     
  15. George W Hedge

    George W Hedge Member Full Member

    238
    7
    Jul 28, 2004
    Its actually the only way to go mate because for some ****ed up annoying reason we have got more or less 0 footage of the best ever boxer in his best ever weight & we have footage from before srr at 147.

    It deeply saddens yet angers me at the same time.

    :twisted: :-(