Leonard v Hagler at 160 in the early-mid 80s - please vote and comment

it sucked like all of srls other fights. a 1983 blowout wouldve been better for the public.

top 10 p4p

try # 49 . I managed to find a spot for him out of the goodness of my heart :good

 

Don't forget, a prime Hagler went the distance with a natural lightweight in 1983. :good

 

Nah, cant see even a prime Leonard stopping prime Hagler, Id say 8-6-1 UD.

Now your OVERrating Leonard, rooster :rofl

 

Damn this guy is biased.

 

This ****in guy :rofl

Im not saying Leonard dominated those rds but you`d have to be a complete biased moron (no offence) to give any of those 4 rds to Hagler.
Every rd has a clear enough winner except 6,9,10 & 12... I gave MMH 9 & 10, SRL the other two.

There is a thread on the British forum & just about every person gives SRL 5 of the 1st 6 rds with Hagler winning rd 5.... surely the overwhelming majority has a better chance of being right than you, especially a non-Leonard fan (to keep it mild)

 

i didnt say dominate, i said sweep you dummy! dont you know the difference? Damn!!

They use the term in basketball championship games. i used it as an analogy for rounds 1-4 which you keep referring to

you want to refer to specifics? I will. Dynamita herself (himself?) even say the rounds are too close but I see the way you just give her (him) the brushoff with your EXCUSES/ Bull****

I got to go the classic forum posters photo section just to get a look at you

 

All Ive done is score the fight for Leonard 115-113, most people do, I think even you did at one point, saying its Leonards best ever performance or some **** (you know what Im talking about)

I also picked Leonard in a primes match, most people dont, not a problem, they could well be right but your more biased AGAINST Leonard than I am FOR ANY fighter, not just Leonard.

I might have SRL in my top 10 p4p & most might not agree with that but seriously... what sort of guy has him at 49 :-( thats beyond mental & a prime example why your opinion matters less than every other poster when Leonard is concerned.

Its all good fun tho, keep it up.


Botswana :smoke

 

I know you said SWEEP, I was just letting you know that IM not saying Leonard dominated the rds, Im merely saying that its NOT HARD to pick a winner in those rds, simple.

Also... at least spell the guys name right, its DINAMITA... I never gave any bs/excuses, I agreed with some points but just let him know where I seen it different in some parts.

Take care now :thumbsup

 

I said the Hagler fight is his best performance.

as for the bias that people claim I dont really care what people think. I'm a debater-that's what I do. so naturally when you got posters on a boxing forum you will get into discussions and debates if need be. sometimes I agree and sometimes I dont.

But it seem alot of times people here to afraid too get into it. If the detail too mcu for them they get uncomfortable and back out by shutting up. That is my complaint about the posters here-that they just believe what they want to believe

people here know I seen Hagler sparring the month before the leonard fight. They know all that. just the fact that they all keep quiet when it comes to that discussion tells me they are too afraid to call me out on it. John Thomas called me out one night becuz he didnt think I could but I put up the photo he asked for. that photo shows Marvin right infront of the Hotel name I mentioned years before when I was describing it.

I took care of that clown, at least for one night.

 

This content is protected

 

^ Oh is that John at work?

 

Who did you score the Leonard-Hagler fight for (& which rds if you can remember) ?

Just to see how different our cards are.

 

It's guess who..................you.

This content is protected

 

Duran-Leonard II is not an incredible win. Duran quit in the ring in a fight that was pretty much even up that point (which was remarkable given that Duran spent the night in the hospital from a stomach he developed before entering the ring).

Leonard-Hearns I was not an incredible win. Hearns was winning the fight going away, outpunching and outboxing Leonard. He gassed in a fight with an overeager referee.

Benitez was an interesting fight. Benitez hardly trained for it, so we didn't get anywhere near his best effort. The stoppage was total bull****. Leonard was winning by a fair margin. Unremarkable contest.

Hagler beat Leonard, so there is nothing incredible about that win. The judging? That was incredible.

Duran beat the crap out of Leonard the first time they met. Duran was incredible. Leonard hanging on for dear life. (I can't believe people actually think that was a close fight.)

Hearns floored Leonard twice and outpointed him in the rematch. Nothing incredible about that.

And Leonard was decked twice and carried by Terry Norris.

And here we are seriously debate whether he should be given a spot among the best fighters of all time? Describing Leonard as "amazing" and so forth?