Leonard V Norris Buildup

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TIGEREDGE, Aug 29, 2008.


  1. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
  2. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,679
    13,482
    Jan 6, 2007
    Sleepy time again, sonny.


    Rock a bye baby,
    on a tree top....

    when the wind blows...


    You're way past your bedtime, and you know how crabby that leaves you the next day.

    I thought your diaper was full of **** but that was just you.

    So back to sleep.

    If you can't sleep, try pulling on your little pecker again.

    That might tire you out.
     
  3. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    Sorry to dissapoint you you english fairy but the diaper you're smelling must be coming from the kids you pushed out. See you back in two hours :lol:
     
  4. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    So this is what the best boxer of the last 30 years looks like? Amazing!
     
  5. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,679
    13,482
    Jan 6, 2007

    English?

    I don't think so, little rooster.


    I hear they use nappies in England, not diapers.

    Well I'll sit here till you get back to sleep.

    No off you go and dream of Ray, dude.
     
  6. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,315
    299
    Jul 23, 2004
    This thread has turned into a farce.
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    Just ignore the fairy he gets bent out of shape every time I bring up the name of Norris. probably lost money on him or something
     
  8. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    IS THE CLASSIC FORUM BEING INVADED BY THE 'CLASSIC' MORONS OF THE GENERAL FORUM?

    it looks like it
     
  9. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    its not me Tigeredge, honest. People can't bring themselves to admit the superiority of Norris then they take it out on me instead.
     
  10. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    86
    Sep 3, 2007
    FINALLY !

    We at last get to know roosters true feelings on SRL.

    :thumbsup
     
  11. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,872
    647
    Jul 11, 2006
    norris deserved this win. people disregard this as a shot and old leonard but it wasnt like he was THAT far gone. he was still there and beating decent comp.

    just becuase it was at the end of his career doesnt mean he was shto to pieces....leonard-comacho now that is shot to pieces.
    it was clear his reflexes wernt there...but that doesnt mean he was gone. hell hopkins lost his handspeed and reflexes and still is/was a elite countepruncher.

    the reason i feel why norris was chosen as leonards opponant was becuase of norris's tko loss to julian jackson and his weak title defence (at the time). also 26-3 is not a great record to choose from when there were other world champions with better records and better reputations, so it wasnt becuase norris was a dangerous opponant that leonard was trying to vanquish.
     
  12. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    I agree that leonard was not shot. but he was very close to it. the ring rust didn't help is well.

    your reasons on why leonard chose terry are spot on
     
  13. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    you cannot tell me that the ray of this fight is the same as the man of 4-10 years before.

    stevie wonder could see that his reflexes had eroded
     
  14. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    i agree with vantagewest 100%. Ray was just outdueled by a tough determined warrior and make no mistake-Terry Norris is a warrior! He comes to fight.

    I also wouldn't make too much of his won loss record either. because of his eagerness to continue, he would often get dq'd. This nearly happened with Leonard if you recall, Terry was just overanxious.

    And Leonard was not shot. Look at him early in the fight and you will see I am right. IMO, Ray was winning the second round with his rough house tactics.

    You might be asking "why is Ray going after him like that?"

    Because Terry was so fast overall, he knew he had no chance trying to box him.

    Consider: this would be like you or me trying to box someone like Roy Jones. We'd get killed! So Ray with his great boxing brain, knew he had to take it to Norris. The only problem was he got tagged and his chin couldn't hold up.

    I'm sorry but that's how it is in life-we can't win them all.

    Listen, it is much tougher to win fights while trying to recover from a blow like that. Ray was doing fine up to that point but then he got tagged again round 3. THis is just too much for most people to handle.

    Terry Norris is a very dangerous opponent with his combination of power and blazing hand speed. Look at all the other foes like Mugabi and Gatti that couldn't take the left hook counter of Terry Norris. They didnt even get past the first round

    I haven't seen any interviews on his opinion on Norris. Maybe he doesn't want to bring it up but he should.
     
  15. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,872
    647
    Jul 11, 2006
    :lol:



    but surely being such a great fighter he could overcome his disadvantages and become a counter puncher to catch norris when he came in with combo's

    im not dissing ray leonard im just saying that terry norris was a terrible pick of opponants to choose from.

    leonard did win the first round pretty decisivly then terry took over, by not doing what hagler was doing by jabbing in and waiting on the outside to catch him. terry just lets his hands go.you got to remember terry norris is not a joke he was a top p4p for his short career. and he did beat a good but not the best ray leonard.

    terry norris looked to be a good but beatable opponant on paper and sadly he was a pandorras box.

    im sure leonard could of taken a title somwhere from the 4 main sanctioning body's anywhere from 154 to 168. and if that was true that means this was a good solid win for leonard.