No, I believe he agreed with the consensus that GGG-Jacobs was more significant. My point is that the difference in significance here is FAR bigger, yet here he argues that Pac-Khan is more significant!
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Great fight but I truly feel it's 2nd fiddle to Spence brook. I believe and actually know that Spence is the best ww and once he beats brook he'll be the man, winner of this fight is playing for runner up. Spence will be available to conquer which ever elite fighter wins the 4th
Danny Garcia has been underrated his whole career, sure he's fought a few over the hill fighters but they were definitely game and there to win. Garcia in my eyes has a much better resume than Thurman. The Khan fight is especially relevant here cos it shows that Garcia can get out boxed and still have that equaliser to change the whole fight. This fight is gonna go just like Wilder v Washington with Garcia the victor. Just at a much much... much higher level.
I heard Thurman sparred against Kendall Holt to prepare for this fight. Garcia and Holt are both known for their great left hooks.
Thurman has better footwork, but he really opens up on those shots and gets reckless, depends on power too much. Garcia has a good chin, also power in both hands like Thurman, more composure, has fought better fighters. I think Swift will get early lead, even hurt KT, but Thurman dominates the 2nd half, his size and power being the difference. Thurman late stoppage over Garcia.