Lets dabble into the Floyd Hater mentality for a moment, just a dabble...

You haven't schooled anyone, especially me OR yourself. It's obvious you need an education. More school would be a boon for you.

You're a **** talker. You're gonna say you schooled people or owned them, but we can all read, something you cannot do well. So you'll just talk **** and try to be funny. It's a good way to disguise the fact you don't know much about boxing. But hey, you can repeat Mayweather's accomplishments w/o looking them up. I'll bet your friends think you're a regular teddy atlas.

 

just some food for thought

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=28002

 

This content is protected

 

School? An idiot newbie with 80 post schooled a veteran poster with 20,000 post? Mama's tit? Tiny brain?

**** off dickhead . . . at least 10 responses in this bull**** thread of yours . . . is ***** slapping you right on your face.

So quit the crap.

 

i never thought about that **** hahahha

 

if you never thought about that its probably cause its not true. Shane was not 37. As a matter of fact Shane is still not 37 today.

And Oscar was older than 33 when he fought PBF

 

Since you're going to ask like a smug little fanboy, I'l lgive you ral answers.

What does that one belt have to do with anything? We all know Judah lost his previous fight. We know he wasn't a champ or titlist. Did you add that thinking people would still see Zab as a champ? Nope. He lost to a journeyman.

The reason Cotto's win looks good while Mayweathers not AS good is simple. Mayweather had been a world Champ since 1998. He's defeated top conteders and been a staple on P4P lists for years. That tells you what level he's on. Not to mention, fighting someone who just lost is below a fighter who's seen as the P4P best. This would be like Sugar Ray Leonard taking on Duran AFTER he lost to Hearns. Top fighters fight winners.

As for Cotto, he just recently entered the level of elite. He was still a prospect a few years ago. Judah represented a jump in comp for him.

Still with me? Want me.....to....type....slower....so...you...can....follow?

Am I right or am I right?[/quote]

All you're doing is looking at age. Not at how they looked. Not how active they've been. This just shows what a newbie you are. You've most likley been a Mayweather fan for a year or so.:roll:

 

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

Silly question? Then why would you hold Cotto to Floyd's level? Who's been a champ, and WORLD Champ since 1998? Who's been a top 10 P4P fighter for the better part of a decade? WHo's had more fights and had more Title fights?

I suckered you in and (hate to say this) exposed your idiocy.

Age catches up with when it catches up. Untill Shane looks like an old man, he should not be considered one. Either way, he doesn't fade down the stretch like DLH has. He's been active and looking good. DLH needs Mayorga or a midget in Forbes to look good.

You haven't schooled anyone, because all you do is ask loaded questions and talk ****. THat's all you've done. You're not scghooling anyone, and you're not winning any sort of debate. All you do is dismiss anything others say.

 

If you started a thread on how my dad should have shot his load off on the wall it still would have been better than this thread here.

 

He is a hugger.

 

Nah nah nah :nono . . . but somebody who has the balls to stand for what he believes and sticks to his handle is very much credible than a poster who keeps changing handles to cover up for the humilations and owning he had.

You honestly think we would believe you are a new member here?

Read all the replies you've got and It will give you a clear view of how other posters treat you.



:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl