Let's face it - Duran was the most complete, ever

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Manassa, Oct 11, 2011.


  1. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Jabbing, crossing, slipping, countering at range - 9/10

    Duran often outjabbed his opponents. Only the best lightweight jabbers may have held an advantage, the only deciding factor being height and reach. A counter right hand better than Archie Moore's.

    Hooking, uppercutting, ducking, weaving - 10/10

    You've never seen anyone better than Duran in this department. He could bend at the waist quicker than anyone and deliver every punch with power and from any angle. The single best uppercutter I've seen.

    Body punching, finding space, strength - 10/10

    Same as the last category. Duran folded a lot of opponents with body shots. Nobody held any significant strength advantage. He would stay in range and maintain the right amount of space to get off his punches, using his elbows, shoulders and head as a barricade.

    Overall speed & power - 9/10

    Duran was quick. He wasn't top of the tree when it came to power, but neither was he very far off. He'd take you out with a single shot after round ten.

    Athleticism & combination punching - 9/10

    I think the 10/10 spot is reserved for those more exquisite combinations delivered by the likes of Ray Robinson and Jose Napoles. Duran's punches were quick individually, but the time elapsed between them was longer - deliberately, I should imagine, to ensure good placement. Duran was incredibly athletic.

    Balance & timing - 10/10

    Perfect again. Always had that low centre of gravity. Duran's ability to throw a punch from any angle owed a lot to his balance, it all stems from that place. His timing made him a very good counter puncher and judge of distance.

    Endurance & durability - 9/10

    Maybe you could put him up a mark. Not sure. I always thought Duran, at lightweight, was as durable & endurable a fighter as you could ever see, more or less, however, fighting heavier opponents left him breathless and stunned on rare occasions.

    Planning & pacing - 8/10

    Duran's early record says a lot. He only lost once and avenged it twice. He was wild in the especially early days, however, he learned quickly and was still in his twenties having mastered most aspects of the game. He knew how to smother a fighter, take his time and ensure victory.

    --

    These were some thoughts running through my head just now. Wasn't going to comment on the determination or 'heart' side of things, too much hassle.

    Anyone want to rate other fighters using the same criteria? Or your own, doesn't matter. Did this quickly so there's probably some stuff missing. Be sensible though - Ray Robinson wasn't a 9 or 10 for infighting.

    P.S. - I'm fully aware that some attributes don't go hand-in-hand - like speed & power. That's up to you to decide how many points to take off. Ali, for speed & power, I'd think of as a 7.5 or 8. Blinding speed, average (5) power. In a way, it may weed out the complete fighters from the not-so-complete, although you will come across some really great fighters who won't do very well on this, like Carlos Monzon.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,048
    25,124
    Jan 3, 2007
    I can't disagree.. He was about as well rounded as one could get.. I will say however that I respectfully disagree with this statement:



    I actually tend to think that these two go hand in hand, when coupled with the right individual and right style... Roberto Duran was one such figure and so was Roy Jones.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    This guy beats him.


    This content is protected


    And this guy.

    This content is protected


    And this guy.

    This content is protected


    This guy gives him trouble.

    This content is protected


    THis guy gives him a run for his money.

    This content is protected



    These guys take one out of three .

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This guy gives him fits.


    This content is protected








    Tough night with this guy.

    This content is protected

    Frustrating one with this guy.

    This content is protected

    Perceptive,perspicacious, punch placement. Pernell 9/10
    Agressive, accurate, aeronautical adjustment. Alexis 8/10
    Bewildering ,bohemian,boxing, bafflement. Benny 9/10
    Rapid, repeated,rapier responses. Ross 7/10
    Canny, continuous, combative,calibration, Canzoneri 7/10
    Incredible,inhuman, involuntary,impassiveness.Ike 9/10.



    Bored now.
     
  4. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007

    You are very correct. What I should have said was speed & strength. Power needs speed to be power, or else it's just strength. And you're right in that depending on the style it can vary. I'm sure Ali was very strong, and he had the speed, but then his style wasn't suited to converting that into power.
     
  5. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Intriguing post, McVey :good

    I don't think there's any one fighter who'd consistently beat all of his contemporaries, let alone the greats in his weight class of all time.

    For me, Duran's only conqueror is Ike Williams. After that, his biggest challenges would be, in order:

    1. Carlos Ortiz
    2. Henry Armstrong
    3. Pernell Whitaker
    4. Tony Canzoneri

    I think Duran would have a comparatively easier time with Benny Leonard, but that Leonard would beat others with ease that Duran may struggle with.
     
  6. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    And despite that, still beatable by plenty of lightweights and welters even at his peak. McVey touched on a few. If DeJesus could do it what's stopping a McFadden, McFarland, Ambers, Ortiz, Joe Brown? :good

    I think Bennah would school him, Gans- I think he could give Gans a lot of trouble with heavy hands and activity.
     
  7. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    93
    Apr 6, 2007
    Duran lost to the best fighters he fought because they were bigger than him, he wasn't at his best, and they weren't far off his own skill set.

    Tell you what makes me laugh though. 'If De Jesus could do it, what could McFarland do?' I can't believe there are people who still believe boxing is this straight forward. If things worked like that, we'd have Foreman beating Ali, wouldn't we?

    Every fighter has black marks. Let's look at what we know.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    I have respect for your ability to read fights, and to assess relative strengths and weaknesses , but sometimes I think we are in danger of forgetting we are talking about two men, with the fallibilities and ,foibles that all men possess.
    We can categorize,and compartmentalise them as much as we want,and I do not really disagree with your assessments, but at the end of the day they are human beings. One may have had a row with the old woman the morning of the fight , one may have slacked off in camp.Ortiz for example was a party guy ,and keeping tabs on Mr Roberto was apparently a nightmare.

    Its possible George Lavigne might out beast Duran, possible though not probable,Lew Jenkins ,[several leagues below Duran, ] might land that right out of the blue ,though Duran's marvellous head movement took the full impact out of a lot of the head shots he had to take. Kid Chocolate could make him look fairly static ,though he was of a too frail temperament imo. Kid Berg had the speed and, skills but, not the power. maybe your friend MR Jimmy Carter, he of the suspicious losses could embarrass Duran for a while?

    I will take a closer , more leisurely look at your ratings later they deserve it.:good
     
  9. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    What have you been smoking, brah?
     
  10. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    :good
     
  11. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    153
    Mar 4, 2009
    I wouldn't count on Ike Williams beating him either.
     
  12. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Whitaker and Armstrong stand the best chance at beating a peak Lightweight Duran, in my opinion. Williams is a very interesting style for him as well, but I'd favour Duran.
     
  13. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Somebody PM me when Pachilles posts.
     
  14. Berlenbach

    Berlenbach Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    1,252
    Sep 27, 2011
    That kind of thing always works both ways though. Ortiz, Ambers, Brown and co were all beaten by lesser fighters than Duran, so he could beat them too.
     
  15. Godhead

    Godhead Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,649
    21
    Jan 26, 2010
    Duran was good but far from the most complete fighter. He lost to all the best fighters he fought. He held his left hand to low and was open for the right hand (Hearns)