Let's give Joshua credit and finally appreciate him

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lordlosh, Sep 26, 2021.


  1. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013

    I agree that Wilder should have done far far far more than what he did and has done, far more. I think everybody on these boards has given him stick for that.

    Fury, well he went to Germany, took the belts from Wlad who hadn't been beaten in a decade.. regardless of the performance, it was a impressive result and then it all went sideways when Fury suffered serious problems.

    Fury after a 3 year lay off then went to the US after Pianeta and Saferi and fought Wilder twice, won both, given a draw then battered Wilder.. I think the criticism of Fury is a little off for the time being, sure the AJ would have been nice but they had a contract and should honour it, as frustrating as that is,

    I also believe if you actually go through AJ's record, it's OK, it's not terrible, but it isn't as good as some people think, look at the age and state of some of those fighters, way last primes and just names.

    And yes, many other fighters do the same but the idea after getting exposed and embarrassed in his own backyard we should start praising AJ.

    I don't think expecting world champions to fight mandatory challengers or tough fights is a big ask.. yes I know it's boxing and I know many champions take easier roads but..

    Go and look at Usyks resume, fought all the other world champions in their own backyards and unified the cruiserweight division, done it in style, then goes to heavyweight, has two scratchy performances and then schools a unified heavyweight champion in his backyard..

    That is something worthy of praise, that is something that rather incredible actually, this idea I should be praising AJ for doing far less.. nah I can't have it.
     
    jmb1356 likes this.
  2. ShovelHook

    ShovelHook Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    12,115
    Jul 22, 2019
    That latter paragraph is all salty speculation on your part to cope with the loss. AJ was also pretty comprehensively battered in there, it wasn't that competitive at all.
     
  3. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013

    I believe that was a small amount of people and the vast majority were ripping Wilder to pieces and joking for months and still joke about his excuses.

    Wilder became a meme on these boards and so did some of his fans.
     
  4. ShovelHook

    ShovelHook Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    12,115
    Jul 22, 2019
    Wilder may not beat Usyk but his right hand would sleep AJ.
    AJ would never shut Usyk out too lol.
     
    N17 likes this.
  5. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013

    Personally I think Hilary deserves more credit..


    It's my belief she certainly has bodies on her record :scared1
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  6. ShovelHook

    ShovelHook Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    12,115
    Jul 22, 2019
    You just said Fury didn't really beat Klitschko and that AJ did yet you call someone else a blind fanboy?
     
    N17 likes this.
  7. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,307
    29,483
    Apr 4, 2005
    You say AJ's record is OK but who else could he have realistically beaten at that time, Wilder was running scared, Fury was suspended for 2 years and was seen as washed up until he fought Wilder. AJ beat the best that was available, I can't see it any other way.

    I honestly don't see the difference between Usyk and Joshua's resume. Both from the start showed tremendous ambition and tried to fight the best. Sure Usyk fought opponents in their backyard but that really wasn't his choice. AJ had the privilege of having a huge boxing market in the UK something that the Ukraine lacks. Had Usyk been able to fill 70K stadiums in Ukraine generating countless millions you don't think he would of taken advantage of that and not only gotten home town vantage but been paid more. What should AJ have done, take a huge pay cut, fight Martin in the US in front of a small crowd for peanuts? As champion tell Wlad who has no title he's going to gift him hometown advantage and fight him in Germany, but both have to accept less money for the privilege because they can't generate the same gate in Germany as the UK?
     
    lordlosh likes this.
  8. nurological

    nurological Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,532
    10,715
    May 25, 2012
    I did what?
     
    N17 likes this.
  9. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013

    I believe it's what they call "Cope" :lol:

    AJ fanboys are struggling, really struggling, they have bought this idea AJ is a monster, a master boxer, a huge puncher.. an all time great.

    They have bought everything Hearn sold them, this is the same Hearn that is selling them Campbell Hatton.



    Anyway, after months of "AJ too big, too strong" they had to sit there saturday night and watch Usyk walk AJ down at times.. reality is sometimes hard to accept.

    So now it's.. let's still give AJ credit instead of admitting they have it wrong, very wrong about AJ.
     
    ShovelHook likes this.
  10. kiwi_boxer

    kiwi_boxer nighty night, ellerbe ☠ ☠ ☠ banned Full Member

    5,716
    5,747
    Aug 25, 2013
    Bang on the money GC

    :chuck:
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  11. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013

    It was you wasn't it..

    Posting my old fury quotes? Or have I got that wrong too?


    :risas3:
     
  12. nurological

    nurological Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,532
    10,715
    May 25, 2012
    Wasn't me, I really would never be arsed quoting anything over a day ago! Especially reaching back that far.
     
    N17 likes this.
  13. ShovelHook

    ShovelHook Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    12,115
    Jul 22, 2019
    This is definitely just one big cope session for the fanboys. I'm just here to laugh at their pathetic praise of their failed hypejob of a hero. Always fun to laugh at Brits losing too as an Irishman, it's in our blood by now.
     
    N17 likes this.
  14. lordlosh

    lordlosh Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,759
    7,483
    Jun 4, 2014
    From what i read from your opinion, you have always been hating on AJ, and praising the jerk Fury. I won't my time researching and copy/pasting your post. Its quite obvious how biased you are from the get going.

    You asked why we should give Joshua credit for fighting X or Y guy, and i straight up explain to you and the rest why.
    Cause he is actually the only one fighting decent opposite.
    I never stated that you particularly was praising Fury or Wilder for fighting x or y guy. Tho i don't say you didn't do it, cause there is/was plenty of people that were stating how Wilder and Fury are fighting the best and all kind of nonsenses. Again not going to lose my time, digging at someone post history.
    And to be fair you are doing the same in this topic, which is absolutely ridiculous claim, as well as being hypocrite at its finest.

    But, but Fury and Wilder manage to fight 3 time. Let's keep it real first, they have fought 2 time, and Fury is again inactive for 1,5 year. You are giving him credit for that?
    And Fury so far did everything to pretty much not let this fight happen. Let's first see if he going to show in October, cause i'm actually not sure in that.

    You are talking about old man, but Fury(not even going to mention Wilder, cause it's pathetic), resume just have Klitschko(39,8 old), and Wilder(who is a hypejob, and i always claim that.

    You are also very good at dodging question that doesn't suit your agenda.

    I have asked you specifically what exactly Fury do after he won against 40 year old Klitschko ??? He had rematch clause, and it was an absolutely must fight to take. What did he do ?
    AJ was in the exact same situation. He won, he then goes and fight the best available guy in the division and have always pushed to fight the best and Unify.

    I'm asking you again.
    What did Fury do after won the titles from Klitschko ??? Compare it to what Joshua do, and all of your comments make no sense at all.
    And again both Fury and Wilder are for longer in the HW division than Joshua, why they didn't fight guys like Povetkin, Ruiz, Parker, Pulev, Takam(when he was in great shape back in the day), Whyte as well.
    Why didn't Fury or Wilder not pushed for unification fight ? Parker was also available, you know ?

    As far as Fury and Wilder goes, don't make yourself looking a f****. The interview is on Wilder twitter. He by himself admitted to ducking 100m. deal to fight Joshua, because he decided to fight Fury, cause he obviously thought that will be an easy fight.

    As far as Fury - Joshua. Hearn made the match, and it was all obvious, for non-blinded guys that AJ team wanted that fight, and do everything to make it done. Unlike what we see from team Fury.
    And in the end it was all team Fury fault. You can cry as much as you can, this is a fact !!!
    And you know why i say it's a fact, because Tyson Fury father himself goes on rant and say that it was all team Fury fault. Bob Arum also goes into hiding from that point on, and he was very local of how Eddie won't deliver the big money match. Which just tell you the whole story who ******* up.

    As far as Klitschko - Fury fight. Let me tell you this. If Rahman and McCall flee(straight up duck) the rematch, some people like you would have probably praised them and slam Lewis, that he would never beat them. It was the same story with Joshua.
    Rematch is what going to tell who the better fighter really is, and if that win/lose was just a fluke.
    Even Fury uncle back in the day was saying this, that Fury owes Klitschko the rematch, and that he will fight him. And yeah we see what happen.

    If Joshua ain't elite, Fury is a garbage level, by his action alone.

    And lastly, yeah you obviously know nothing. Usyk was going to do x or y, blq, blq, blq. Did Hearn manage to do what he wanted? To get higher stake of the pie, cause it was all about, and it was the same against Pulev, if you actually following the events. And yeah Hearn tactics work outs, and Joshua get higher purse from that fight. That was all about. There was never even the slight possibility for Joshua to drop a belt. Ah also to show the governing body, who actually control the cards, and that they can't put all the demands.
     
  15. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013


    The Klitschkos got tons of stick for their reigns, the division was called "poor", sure they have incredible records on paper (KO percentages and defences) and have great achievements but are they spoken about as the greatest?

    They dominated their era, AJ isn't even dominating his era, he isn't regarded as number 1, he has been slapped around and outboxed by much smaller men.

    My point is, sure AJ may have fought the best he could AT TIMES, and sure it might not be all his fault that some fights didn't happen, people need to look closely at his record.. old man Wlad, old man Povetkin, old man Pulev

    It isn't what some make it out to be, Takam FFS, Molina FFS, AJ hasn't fought a list of incredible fighters, he has fought some half decent and old past it names.

    he won the title from Charles Martin, who many call the worst heavyweight champion of ALL TIME.

    Parker was a boring, safety first performance that went the distance, AJ didn't drop or hurt Parker.. Yet Chisora and Whyte did.. explain it to me.


    I see AJ as a lot of smoke and mirrors, great promotion and hype.

    When he has fought opponents who have turned up somewhat in their prime and wanted to actually fight him.. AJ has lost.

    Even the Ruiz rematch, Ruiz turns up morbidly obese and it still goes the distance.. AJ isn't what you otmothers think he is.